Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30194137›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2018

Enhancing immunotherapy of STING agonist for lymphoma in preclinical models.

Adrienne Sallets, Sophie Robinson, Adel Kardosh, Ronald Levy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. CD47 monoclonal antibodies differ in their capacity to induce immune response.European journal of microbiology & immunology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Development of thermosensitive resiquimod-loaded liposomes for enhanced cancer immunotherapy.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Exploration of Pattern Recognition Receptor Agonists as Candidate Adjuvants.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adrienne SalletsDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-3333-7609
Sophie RobinsonDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Adel KardoshDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Ronald LevyDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.ORCID 0000-0003-2061-0650
Stanford University · US

Funding

Enhancing Cancer Immunotherapy: Targeting the Tumor and Targeting the HostR35CA197353 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LEVY, RONALD · 2016 to 2022
$6.1M
NCI NIH HHS R35 CA197353
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Direct activation of tumor infiltrating antigen-presenting cells (APCs) by intratumoral injection of STING agonists (STINGa) leads to regression of the treated lymphoma tumor. Because STING activation induces apoptosis in lymphoma cells in vitro, we distinguished between the direct therapeutic vs the indirect immunotherapeutic properties of STINGa in vivo. Employing wild-type or STING knockout hosts bearing either wild-type or STING knockout tumor cells, we demonstrated that local tumor regression is totally dependent on STING expression by the host and is therefore immune mediated. However, distant untreated tumors are weakly affected after injection of STINGa to a single tumor site. Therefore, using the STINGa currently being tested in clinical trials, we screened for immunomodulatory agents that could synergize with the STING pathway to induce a systemic antitumor immune response and regression of distant tumors. We combined the STINGa with agents that improve APC or T-cell function. We found that modulation of both APCs and T cells can enhance control of distant lymphoma tumors by STINGa. In particular, adding an anti-GITR antibody induced lymphocyte expansion in the lymph node draining the treated site followed by increased T-cell infiltration in the distant tumor. Furthermore, more of these CD8 T cells at the distant site expressed PD-1. Therefore, blockade of PD-1 further enhanced tumor control at the distant site, leading to cure in 50% of the mice. These preclinical data provide the rationale for testing local injection of STINGa followed by agonistic anti-GITR and anti-PD-1 antibodies as immunotherapy for human lymphoma.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCell Line, TumorDrug SynergismFemaleGlucocorticoid-Induced TNFR-Related ProteinHeterograftsHumansImmunotherapyLymphomaMembrane ProteinsMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorAntibodies, MonoclonalGlucocorticoid-Induced TNFR-Related ProteinMembrane ProteinsPdcd1 protein, mouseProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorSting1 protein, mouseSTING ProteinTnfrsf18 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID30194137
PMCPMC6134215
OpenAlexW2889875368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.