SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2018
Clinical Decision Support Systems for Drug Allergy Checking: Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.
- Alert fatigue measurement in clinical decision support: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Pooled it
- Evaluating the Impact of the Grading and Assessment of Predictive Tools Framework on Clinicians and Health Care Professionals' Decisions in Selecting Clinical Predictive Tools: Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Trial
- Sustaining accurate penicillin allergy labels through electronic health record interoperability: a cross-sectional observational follow-up study 3 years after initial penicillin allergy evaluation.BMJ open quality · 2026Article
- Tackling medication errors: how a systems approach improves patient safety.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2026Review
- Discrepancies and Quality of Medication Allergy Documentation Between Primary Care and Hospital Information Systems: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Identifying false-positive drug allergy alerts based on drug tolerance assertions: a retrospective study.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- The Infectious Diseases Orchestrator: Embracing AI Literacy in the Agentic Era.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- The combined use of natural language processing and electronic health records data to identify historical tolerances of β-lactams and promote clinician confidence in future use.Health systems (Basingstoke, England) · 2026Article
- Assessment of penicillin allergy evaluation practices among clinicians in China: a nationwide cross-sectional survey.BMJ open · 2025Article
- A scoping review of natural language processing in addressing medically inaccurate information: Errors, misinformation, and hallucination.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2025Article
- Natural Language Processing for Enhanced Clinical Decision Support in Allergy Verification for Medication Prescriptions.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2025Article
- Allergy alerting and overrides for opioid analogues across two health systems.BMJ health & care informatics · 2025Observational
- Implementation of an Integrated, Clinical Decision Support Tool at the Point of Antihypertensive Medication Refill Request to Improve Hypertension Management: Controlled Pre-Post Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Digital Decision Support for Perioperative Care of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Call to Action.JMIR diabetes · 2025Article
- Care Team Attributes Predict Likelihood of Utilizing Pharmacogenomic Information During Inpatient Prescribing.Clinical and translational science · 2025Observational
- Disposition of emergency department patients presenting with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced angioedema.International journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
- The PDC30 Chatbot-Development of a Psychoeducational Resource on Dementia Caregiving Among Family Caregivers: Mixed Methods Acceptability Study.JMIR aging · 2025Article
- Clinical decision support systems' effect in reducing medication errors and adverse drug events: an expanded review from Making Healthcare Safer IV.BMJ digital health & AI · 2025Review
- A Data Mining Approach on Polypharmacy and Drug-drug Interactions of Common Diabetes Medications.Current drug metabolism · 2025Review
- Using shared clinical decision support to reduce adverse drug events and improve patient safety.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWorldwide, the burden of allergies-in particular, drug allergies-is growing. In the process of prescribing, dispensing, or administering a drug, a medication error may occur and can have adverse consequences; for example, a drug may be given to a patient with a documented allergy to that particular drug. Computerized physician order entry (CPOE) systems with built-in clinical decision support systems (CDSS) have the potential to prevent such medication errors and adverse events.
objectiveThe aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview regarding all aspects of CDSS for drug allergy, including documenting, coding, rule bases, alerts and alert fatigue, and outcome evaluation.
methodsThe Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed as much as possible and searches were conducted in 5 databases using CPOE, CDSS, alerts, and allergic or allergy as keywords. Bias could not be evaluated according to PRISMA guidelines due to the heterogeneity of study types included in the review.
resultsOf the 3160 articles considered, 60 met the inclusion criteria. A further 9 articles were added based on expert opinion, resulting in a total of 69 articles. An interrater agreement of 90.9% with a reliability Κ=.787 (95% CI 0.686-0.888) was reached. Large heterogeneity across study objectives, study designs, study populations, and reported results was found. Several key findings were identified. Evidence of the usefulness of clinical decision support for drug allergies has been documented. Nevertheless, there are some important problems associated with their use. Accurate and structured documenting of information on drug allergies in electronic health records (EHRs) is difficult, as it is often not clear to healthcare providers how and where to document drug allergies. Besides the underreporting of drug allergies, outdated or inaccurate drug allergy information in EHRs poses an important problem. Research on the use of coding terminologies for documenting drug allergies is sparse. There is no generally accepted standard terminology for structured documentation of allergy information. The final key finding is the consistently reported low specificity of drug allergy alerts. Current systems have high alert override rates of up to 90%, leading to alert fatigue. Important challenges remain for increasing the specificity of drug allergy alerts. We found only one study specifically reporting outcomes related to CDSS for drug allergies. It showed that adverse drug events resulting from overridden drug allergy alerts do not occur frequently.
conclusionsAccurate and comprehensive recording of drug allergies is required for good use of CDSS for drug allergy screening. We found considerable variation in the way drug allergy are recorded in EHRs. It remains difficult to reduce drug allergy alert overload while maintaining patient safety as the highest priority. Future research should focus on improving alert specificity, thereby reducing override rates and alert fatigue. Also, the effect on patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness should be evaluated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.