Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30193588›Full record

ArticleBMC anesthesiology2018

Incidence of tolerance in children undergoing repeated administration of propofol for proton radiation therapy: a retrospective study.

RyungA Kang, Byung Seop Shin, Young Hee Shin, Nam-Su Gil, Ye Na Oh, Ji Seon Jeong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

RyungA KangDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University school of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam, Seoul, 06352, South Korea.
Byung Seop ShinDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University school of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam, Seoul, 06352, South Korea.
Young Hee ShinDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University school of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam, Seoul, 06352, South Korea.
Nam-Su GilDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University school of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam, Seoul, 06352, South Korea.
Ye Na OhDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University school of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam, Seoul, 06352, South Korea.
Ji Seon JeongDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University school of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam, Seoul, 06352, South Korea. jiseon78.jeong@samsung.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5396-1030
Samsung Medical Center · KRKangwon National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPropofol is an excellent hypnotic drug for use in repeated radiation procedures in young children. To date, tolerance to propofol generally does not develop in pediatric patients undergoing radiation therapy. However, several studies have suggested that there may be potential for development of tolerance to propofol. The aim of this study was to evaluate the development of a tolerance to propofol used for repeated deep sedation in children undergoing proton radiation therapy (PRT).

methodsAll children undergoing PRT at our institution between December 2015 and January 2018 were eligible for inclusion in this study. Sedation was induced by a bolus dose of propofol (2.0 mg.kg

resultsFifty-eight children were analyzed. The mean (SD) age was 4.5 (2.1) years. The mean (SD) number of treatment sessions was 19 (7). Fifteen patients (26%) developed tolerance to propofol. However, there were no significant differences between the children who developed tolerance and the children who did not develop tolerance in mean propofol dose and awakening time over time (p = 0.887 and P = 0.652, respectively). Age, the number of PRT, and attending anesthesiologists was not significantly associated with the incidence of tolerance to propofol.

conclusionRepeated prolonged deep sedation for PRT elicited multiple times over several weeks in young children using propofol did not develop tolerance in 74% of patients. Although the incidence of 26% tolerance to propofol may still be present, the increase in propofol dose was minimal. Therefore, the use of repeated propofol for children was safe.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsChildChild, PreschoolDrug Administration ScheduleDrug ToleranceFemaleHumansHypnotics and SedativesIncidenceInfusions, IntravenousMalePropofolProton TherapyRetrospective StudiesHypnotics and SedativesPropofolAnesthesiaChildrenDeep sedationPropofolProton radiation therapyTolerance

Identifiers

PMID30193588
PMCPMC6128996
OpenAlexW2891257140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.