Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30193572›Full record

ReviewBMC family practice2018

Family physicians perceived role in perinatal mental health: an integrative review.

Maria Noonan, Owen Doody, Julie Jomeen, Andrew O'Regan, Rose Galvin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC family practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Physician Referrals During Prenatal Care.Maternal and child health journal · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maria NoonanDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Education & Health Sciences Health Sciences Building, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland. Maria.noonan@ul.ie.ORCID 0000-0003-2313-9964
Owen DoodyDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Education & Health Sciences Health Sciences Building, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Julie JomeenFaculty of Health and Social Care, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Andrew O'ReganGraduate Entry Medical School, Faculty of Education & Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Rose GalvinSchool of Allied Health, Faculty of Education & Health Sciences, Health Sciences Building, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResponding to and caring for women who experience mental health problems during the perinatal period, from pregnancy up to one year after birth, is complex and requires a multidisciplinary response. Family physicians are ideally placed to provide an effective response as it is recognised that they are responsible for organising care and supports for women and their families. This paper reports an integrative review undertaken to examine family physicians' perceived role in perinatal mental health care and concludes with recommendations for health policy, research and practice.

methodA systematic search of literature in seven databases from January 2000 to March 2016 identified a total of 1125 articles. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed-method studies were eligible for inclusion if they explored family physicians' experiences of caring for women who experience perinatal mental health problems.

resultsThirteen articles reporting 11 studies met the inclusion criteria for this review and quality of included studies were assessed using published criteria for the critical appraisal of qualitative and quantitative research methods. Cross-study narrative syntheses of quantitative and qualitative findings are presented under three themes: identification of perinatal mental health problems, management of perinatal mental health problems and barriers to care provision. While family physicians recognise their role in relation to perinatal mental health the collective interpretation revealed that; they receive variable levels of preparation for this role, no consistent approach to screening exists, pharmacological management of mood disorders is the main treatment modality and limited access to specialist perinatal mental health services exists which impacts on pharmacology decisions.

conclusionFamily physicians require timely access to local integrated care pathways that provide a wide range of services that are culturally sensitive, perinatal mental health specific, support psychological well-being and infant/family mental health. Family physicians are open to incorporating a brief validated screening tool into primary practice supported by succinct guidelines. Research that examines training needs in relation to perinatal mental health could be used to inform family physician training programmes and curriculum development around perinatal mental health.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelMental HealthPhysicians, FamilyPhysician's RoleDepression, PostpartumFemaleHumansMass ScreeningMental DisordersPerceptionPostnatal CarePregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrenatal CarePuerperal DisordersFamily physicianGeneral practitionerIntegrated servicesIntegrative reviewPerinatal mental healthPostpartum depressionReferral pathwaysScreening

Identifiers

PMID30193572
PMCPMC6128990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.