Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30193349›Full record

ArticleJAMA dermatology2018

Comparison of Dermatologist Density Between Urban and Rural Counties in the United States.

Hao Feng, Juliana Berk-Krauss, Paula W Feng, Jennifer A Stein

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA dermatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06463860 (Retrospective, Multi-Center Study to Evaluate the Performance of DermDx as an Adjunctive Tool for Primary Care Physicians in the Detection of Skin Cancers), which is not on this map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06463860 completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Retrospective, Multi-Center Study to Evaluate the Performance of DermDx as an Adjunctive Tool for Primary Care Physicians in the Detection of Skin Cancers

TypeobservationalSponsorMetaOptima Technology Inc.Ran2024 to 2024Enrolled81ConditionsSkin CancerArmsDermDx
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Artificial intelligence in dermatology: A literature review of current evidence and clinical implementation.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2026
    Review
  5. Home Phototherapy for Psoriasis: Evidence and Implementation.Photodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Implementing GPT-4 Learning Models in Dermatology: An Assessment of Medical Quality and Utility.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hao FengThe Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University School of Medicine, New York.
Juliana Berk-KraussThe Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University School of Medicine, New York.
Paula W FengYale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Jennifer A SteinThe Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University School of Medicine, New York.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: As the US population continues to increase and age, there is an unmet need for dermatologic care; therefore, it is important to identify and understand the characteristics and patterns of the dermatologist workforce. Objective: To analyze the longitudinal dermatologist density and urban-rural disparities using a standardized classification scheme. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study analyzed county-level data for 1995 to 2013 from the Area Health Resources File to evaluate the longitudinal trends and demographic and environmental factors associated with the geographic distribution of dermatologists. Main Outcomes and Measures: Active US dermatologist and physician density. Results: In this study of nationwide data on dermatologists, dermatologist density increased by 21% from 3.02 per 100 000 people to 3.65 per 100 000 people from 1995 to 2013; the gap between the density of dermatologists in urban and other areas increased from 2.63 to 3.06 in nonmetropolitan areas and from 3.41 to 4.03 in rural areas. The ratio of dermatologists older than 55 years to younger than 55 years increased 75% in nonmetropolitan and rural areas (from 0.32 to 0.56) and 170% in metropolitan areas (from 0.34 to 0.93). Dermatologists tended to be located in well-resourced, urban communities. Conclusions and Relevance: Our findings suggest that substantial disparities in the geographic distribution of dermatologists exist and have been increasing with time. Correcting the workforce disparity is important for patient care.

Indexed as

Rural PopulationUrban PopulationAdultDermatologistsDermatologyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealthcare DisparitiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID30193349
PMCPMC6248119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.