ArticleJAMA dermatology2018
Assessment of Treatment of Refractory Granuloma Faciale With Intralesional Rituximab.
Article in JAMA dermatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Granuloma faciale and Takayasu arteritis in a child: a case report].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2025Article
- [Intralesional rituximab for refractory granuloma faciale].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Topical ruxolitinib for the treatment of granuloma faciale.JAAD case reports · 2023Article
- Refractory granuloma faciale successfully treated with adjunct topical JAK inhibitor.JAAD case reports · 2023Article
- [Eosinophilic dermatoses].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Granuloma faciale (GF) is a rare, benign inflammatory dermatosis of unknown cause. Some reports have suggested that it could be part of the spectrum of IgG4-related sclerosing diseases. Granuloma faciale is characterized by single or multiple red-brown nodules, most frequently occurring on the face, and it can produce severe disfigurement. Treatment is difficult, and poor outcomes are often seen. Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody against CD-20 approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for treatment of some autoimmune and tumoral diseases. Objective: To evaluate the treatment of refractory GF with intralesional rituximab. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this case series, 3 patients with biopsy-proved refractory GF who underwent treatment at a dermatology outpatient clinic of a tertiary referral hospital were evaluated. The study was conducted from August 2015 to December 2017. Interventions: Doses of 0.5 to 1 mL/cm2 of intralesional rituximab, 10 mg/mL, were administered monthly for 6 months and thereafter depending on clinical response. In 2 patients, peripheral blood B-cell counts were monitored before and during treatment, and in 1 patient, only during treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: Reduction in size of the lesions, ultrasonography evaluation, subjective improvement, and adverse events were monitored throughout the course of therapy. Results: All 3 of the patients were men (ages from 30s to 60s). They showed a significant reduction in the size and thickness of GF both clinically and on ultrasonography evaluation. Two patients had a complete response and the third, a partial response. A reduction in peripheral blood B-cell count was observed in the 3 patients, suggesting that the action of rituximab could be systemic. No severe adverse reactions were reported. Conclusions and Relevance: Intralesional rituximab may represent a novel and well-tolerated therapy for refractory GF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.