Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30193253›Full record

Trial reportJAMA internal medicine2018

Effect of Mobile Device-Supported Single-Patient Multi-crossover Trials on Treatment of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Richard L Kravitz, Christopher H Schmid, Maria Marois, Barth Wilsey, Deborah Ward, Ron D Hays, Naihua Duan, Youdan Wang, Scott MacDonald, Anthony Jerant and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA internal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02116621 (N-of-1 Trials Using mHealth in Chronic Pain Aka PREEMPT), which is not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
31.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02116621 nacompletednot on this map

N-of-1 Trials Using mHealth in Chronic Pain Aka PREEMPT (Personalized Research for Monitoring Pain Treatment)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, DavisRan2014 to 2017Enrolled215ConditionsMusculoskeletal Pain, Chronic PainArmsTrialist Intervention, smartphone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. N -of-1 Trials in Nephrology : Moving beyond Case Series.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. N-of-1 trials: The epitome of personalized medicine?Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Richard L KravitzDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento.
Christopher H SchmidDepartment of Biostatistics and Center for Evidence Synthesis in Health, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Maria MaroisCenter for Health Care Policy and Research, University of California, Davis, Sacramento.
Barth WilseyVeterans Affairs Northern California Health Care System, Sacramento Medical Center, Mather.
Deborah WardBetty Irene Moore School of Nursing, University of California, Davis, Sacramento.
Ron D HaysDivision of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles.
Naihua DuanDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Youdan WangDepartment of Biostatistics and Center for Evidence Synthesis in Health, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Scott MacDonaldDepartment of Clinical Informatics, University of California, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento.
Anthony JerantDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento.
Joseph L ServadioDepartment of Biostatistics and Center for Evidence Synthesis in Health, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
David HaddadOpen mHealth, New York, New York.
Ida SimOpen mHealth, New York, New York.
University of California, Davis · USBrown University · USOpen Society Foundations · USColumbia University · USMinnesota Department of Health · USUniversity of California Davis Medical Center · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USVA Northern California Health Care System · US

Funding

N-of-1 Trials Using mHealth in Chronic PainR01NR013938 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI KRAVITZ, RICHARD L · 2012 to 2016
$2.9M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR013938
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Individually designed single-patient multi-crossover (n-of-1) trials can facilitate tailoring of treatments directed at various conditions, including chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMSP) but are potentially burdensome, which may limit uptake in research and practice. Objectives: To determine whether patients randomized to participate in an n-of-1 trial supported by a mobile health (mHealth) app would experience less pain and improved global health, adherence, satisfaction, and shared decision making compared with patients assigned to usual care. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial compared participation in an individualized, mHealth-supported n-of-1 trial vs usual care. The participating 215 patients had CMSP for at least 6 weeks, had a smartphone or tablet with a data plan, were enrolled in northern California from July 2014 through July 2016, and were followed for up to 1 year by 48 clinicians in academic, community, Veterans Affairs, and military settings. Interventions: Intervention patients met with their clinicians and used a desktop interface to select treatments and trial parameters for an n-of-1 trial comparing 2 pain-management regimens. The mHealth app provided reminders to take designated treatments on assigned days and to upload responses to daily questions on pain and treatment-associated adverse effects. Control patients received care as usual. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was change in the PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) pain-related interference 8-item short-form scale (full scale range, 41-78) from baseline to 6 months. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported pain intensity, overall health, analgesic adherence, trust in clinician, satisfaction with care, medication-related shared decision making, and, for the n-of-1 group only, participant engagement and experience. Results: Among 215 patients (108 randomized to the n-of-1 intervention and 107 to control), 102 (47%) were women, and the mean (SD) age was 55.5 (11.1) years. At the 6-month follow-up, pain interference was reduced in both groups, though there was no difference between the intervention and control groups (-1.36 points; 95% CI, -2.91 to 0.19 points; P = .09). There were no advantages in secondary outcomes for intervention patients vs control patients except for higher medication-related shared decision making at 6 months (between-group difference, 11.9 points; 95% CI, 2.6-21.2 points; P = .01). Among patients assigned to the n-of-1 group, 88% (n = 86) affirmed that the mHealth app could help people like them manage their pain. Conclusions and Relevance: In this population of patients with CMSP, mHealth-supported n-of-1 trials were feasible and associated with a satisfactory user experience, but n-of-1 trial participation did not significantly improve pain interference at 6 months vs usual care. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02116621.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapySmartphoneTelemedicineAdultAgedAnalgesicsChronic PainCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal PainPain ManagementPain MeasurementQuality of LifeAnalgesics

Identifiers

PMID30193253
PMCPMC6233756
OpenAlexW2891090291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.