ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2018
The Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research Consortium: Integrating Genomic Sequencing in Diverse and Medically Underserved Populations.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 112 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
112 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 164 citations in OpenAlex.
- Psychological outcomes related to exome and genome sequencing result disclosure: a meta-analysis of seven Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER) Consortium studies.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019Pooled it
- Investigating the Impact of Screen-Sharing Visual Aids during Genomic Results Disclosure via Telehealth in Diverse Families in the TeleKidSeq Pilot Study.Public health genomics · 2025Trial
- The NYCKidSeq randomized controlled trial: Impact of GUÍA digitally enhanced genetic results disclosure in diverse families.American journal of human genetics · 2023Trial
- Cancer Health Assessments Reaching Many (CHARM): A clinical trial assessing a multimodal cancer genetics services delivery program and its impact on diverse populations.Contemporary clinical trials · 2021Trial
- Trial
- Proof of Concept of a Personalized Genetic Risk Tool to Promote Smoking Cessation: High Acceptability and Reduced Cigarette Smoking.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2021Trial
- Exome sequencing early in outpatient evaluation in NCGENES 2: Changing the course of the diagnostic odyssey?HGG advances · 2026Article
- Determinants of DNA-sequence-based Diagnostic Yield in the CSER Consortium.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Promoting Family Communication for Cascade Cancer Genetic Testing With Relational Agent Role-Play: Quasi-Experimental Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Patient-initiated lifestyle changes following receipt of genetic test results in a predominantly marginalized population.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Community-oriented, hospital level genetics: a new approach to improve access for underserved communities.Pediatric research · 2025Article
- Optimizing participant and community engagement in cancer genomic sequencing research.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2025Article
- Pan-Cancer Exome-wide analysis of germline mutational patterns and pathways.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Anaplastic meningioma in a 6-year-old with somatic YAP1::MAML2 fusion and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 4 (MEN4) syndrome.Cancer genetics · 2025Article
- Genomic sequencing in diverse and underserved pediatric populations: Parent perspectives on understanding, uncertainty, psychosocial impact, and personal utility of results.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2025Article
- Parental knowledge, attitudes, satisfaction and decisional conflict regarding whole genome sequencing in the Genomic Medicine Service: a multisite survey study in England.Journal of medical genetics · 2025Article
- Genomic sequencing: the case for equity of care in the era of personalized medicine.Pediatric research · 2025Review
- When families bridge the research-clinical divide: An exploration of values regarding cascade screening in genomic research.Genetics in medicine open · 2025Article
- Perspectives of parents receiving normal results from genomic newborn screening: a mixed-methods evaluation from the early check program.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Employing effective recruitment and retention strategies to engage a diverse pediatric population in genomics research.American journal of human genetics · 2024Article
52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
39 authors at 17 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research (CSER) consortium, now in its second funding cycle, is investigating the effectiveness of integrating genomic (exome or genome) sequencing into the clinical care of diverse and medically underserved individuals in a variety of healthcare settings and disease states. The consortium comprises a coordinating center, six funded extramural clinical projects, and an ongoing National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) intramural project. Collectively, these projects aim to enroll and sequence over 6,100 participants in four years. At least 60% of participants will be of non-European ancestry or from underserved settings, with the goal of diversifying the populations that are providing an evidence base for genomic medicine. Five of the six clinical projects are enrolling pediatric patients with various phenotypes. One of these five projects is also enrolling couples whose fetus has a structural anomaly, and the sixth project is enrolling adults at risk for hereditary cancer. The ongoing NHGRI intramural project has enrolled primarily healthy adults. Goals of the consortium include assessing the clinical utility of genomic sequencing, exploring medical follow up and cascade testing of relatives, and evaluating patient-provider-laboratory level interactions that influence the use of this technology. The findings from the CSER consortium will offer patients, healthcare systems, and policymakers a clearer understanding of the opportunities and challenges of providing genomic medicine in diverse populations and settings, and contribute evidence toward developing best practices for the delivery of clinically useful and cost-effective genomic sequencing in diverse healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.