Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30192874›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Cariogenic potential of sweet flavors in electronic-cigarette liquids.

Shin Ae Kim, Samuel Smith, Carlos Beauchamp, Yang Song, Martin Chiang, Anthony Giuseppetti, Stanislav Frukhtbeyn, Ian Shaffer, Joshua Wilhide, Denis Routkevitch and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pulmonary effects of e-liquid flavors: a systematic review.Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. E-Cigarette effects on oral health: A molecular perspective.Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Influence of electronic cigarette vapour on theBiomaterial investigations in dentistry · 2025
    Article
  12. The effect ofJournal of oral microbiology · 2025
    Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Shin Ae KimVolpe Research Center, American Dental Association Foundation, Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States of America.
Samuel SmithDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.
Carlos BeauchampNational Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce, Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4109-2824
Yang SongNational Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce, Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States of America.
Martin ChiangNational Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce, Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States of America.
Anthony GiuseppettiVolpe Research Center, American Dental Association Foundation, Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States of America.
Stanislav FrukhtbeynVolpe Research Center, American Dental Association Foundation, Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States of America.
Ian ShafferMolecular Characterization and Analysis Complex, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7408-5196
Joshua WilhideMolecular Characterization and Analysis Complex, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Denis RoutkevitchDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
John M OndovDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America.
Jeffrey J KimVolpe Research Center, American Dental Association Foundation, Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7563-1278
American Dental Association · USNational Institute of Standards and Technology · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Colorado Boulder · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost electronic-cigarette liquids contain propylene glycol, glycerin, nicotine and a wide variety of flavors of which many are sweet. Sweet flavors are classified as saccharides, esters, acids or aldehydes. This study investigates changes in cariogenic potential when tooth surfaces are exposed to e-cigarette aerosols generated from well-characterized reference e-liquids with sweet flavors.

methodsReference e-liquids were prepared by combining 20/80 propylene glycol/glycerin (by volume fraction), 10 mg/mL nicotine, and flavors. Aerosols were generated by a Universal Electronic-Cigarette Testing Device (49.2 W, 0.2 Ω). Streptococcus mutans (UA159) were exposed to aerosols on tooth enamel and the biological and physiochemical parameters were measured.

resultsE-cigarette aerosols produced four-fold increase in microbial adhesion to enamel. Exposure to flavored aerosols led to two-fold increase in biofilm formation and up to a 27% decrease in enamel hardness compared to unflavored controls. Esters (ethyl butyrate, hexyl acetate, and triacetin) in e-liquids were associated with consistent bacteria-initiated enamel demineralization, whereas sugar alcohol (ethyl maltol) inhibited S. mutans growth and adhesion. The viscosity of the e-liquid allowed S. mutans to adhere to pits and fissures. Aerosols contained five metals (mean ± standard deviation): calcium (0.409 ± 0.002) mg/L, copper (0.011 ± 0.001) mg/L, iron (0.0051 ± 0.0003) mg/L, magnesium (0.017 ± 0.002) mg/L, and silicon (0.166 ± 0.005) mg/L.

conclusionsThis study systematically evaluated e-cigarette aerosols and found that the aerosols have similar physio-chemical properties as high-sucrose, gelatinous candies and acidic drinks. Our data suggest that the combination of the viscosity of e-liquids and some classes of chemicals in sweet flavors may increase the risk of cariogenic potential. Clinical investigation is warranted to confirm the data shown here.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsBacterial AdhesionBiofilmsDental CariesDental EnamelFlavoring AgentsHumansStreptococcus mutansSurface PropertiesFlavoring Agents

Identifiers

PMID30192874
PMCPMC6128655
OpenAlexW2889727268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.