Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30192856›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2018

The trend of resistance to antibiotics for ocular infection of Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci, and Corynebacterium compared with 10-years previous: A retrospective observational study.

Hideto Deguchi, Koji Kitazawa, Kanae Kayukawa, Eri Kondoh, Akiko Fukumoto, Toshihide Yamasaki, Shigeru Kinoshita, Chie Sotozono

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Spectrum and resistance in bacterial infections of the ocular surface in a German tertiary referral center 2009-2019.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Current Evidence forMicroorganisms · 2021
    Review
  16. Antibiotic Resistance Pattern ofFrontiers in pediatrics · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Microbiome of the Meibum and Ocular Surface in Healthy Subjects.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2020
    Article
  20. Carbon Dots Fabrication: Ocular Imaging and Therapeutic Potential.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hideto DeguchiBaptist Eye Institute, Kyoto, Japan.
Koji KitazawaBaptist Eye Institute, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2203-5776
Kanae KayukawaBaptist Eye Institute, Kyoto, Japan.
Eri KondohDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Akiko FukumotoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Toshihide YamasakiBaptist Eye Institute, Kyoto, Japan.
Shigeru KinoshitaDepartment of Frontier Medical Science and Technology for Ophthalmology, Kyoto, Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Chie SotozonoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo retrospectively identify epidemiological trends of infection on the ocular surface and investigate trends of resistance to bacterial antibiotics compared with 10-years previous for Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS), and Corynebacterium in Japan. MATERIALS AND

methodsBacterial isolate samples were collected from the conjunctival sacs of eyes afflicted with conjunctivitis, keratitis, dacryocystitis, and hordeolum from September 2004 through November 2005 (n = 145 isolates) and September 2014 through November 2015 (n = 195 isolates) at the Baptist Eye Institute, Kyoto, Japan. The prevalence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), methicillin-resistant CNS (MR-CNS), and fluoroquinolone-resistant Corynebacterium were examined, and susceptibility of isolated bacteria to levofloxacin (LVFX), cefmenoxime (CMX), chloramphenicol (CP), erythromycin (EM), vancomycin (VCM), and arbekacin (ABK) were compared between both time periods using the disc susceptibility method.

resultsOver the 10-year period from initial to final examination, the prevalence of MRSA and MR-CNS significantly decreased from 52% to 22% (P < 0.05) and from 47% to 25% (P < 0.05), respectively, yet there was no change in the prevalence of fluoroquinolone-resistant Corynebacterium (60% and 54%; P = 0.38). Antibiotic-resistance trend analysis revealed that susceptibility to antibiotics in 2014-2015 was similar to that in 2004-2005. MRSA and MR-CNS were susceptible to CP (88%), VCM (100%), and ABK (100%), while fluoroquinolone-resistant Corynebacterium was susceptible to CMX (100%), VCM (100%), and ABK (96%).

conclusionThe prevalence of MRSA and MR-CNS significantly decreased between the two time periods, yet more than 50% of the Corynebacterium isolates were still resistant to LVFX. Although no increase in bacterial resistance to antibiotics was found, a cautionary use of fluoroquinolone eye drops should be considered.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialAnti-Bacterial AgentsCorynebacteriumEye InfectionsFemaleFluoroquinolonesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial AgentsFluoroquinolones

Identifiers

PMID30192856
PMCPMC6128643
OpenAlexW2891215732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.