Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30192832›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

The utility of two interview-based physical activity questionnaires in healthy young adults: Comparison with accelerometer data.

René Schilling, Eveline Schärli, Xenia Fischer, Lars Donath, Oliver Faude, Serge Brand, Uwe Pühse, Lukas Zahner, Simon Rosenbaum, Philip B Ward and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Validity and reliability of self-reported methods for assessment of 24-h movement behaviours: a systematic review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

René SchillingDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Eveline SchärliDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Xenia FischerDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Lars DonathDepartment of Intervention Research in Exercise Training, German Sport University, Cologne, Germany.
Oliver FaudeDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Serge BrandDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Uwe PühseDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Lukas ZahnerDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Simon RosenbaumSchool of Psychiatry, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.
Philip B WardSchool of Psychiatry, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.
Attilio CarraroDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Markus GerberDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6140-8948
University of Basel · CHBlack Dog Institute · AUGerman Sport University Cologne · DEUniversity of Padua · ITUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate assessment of physical activity is essential to determine the magnitude of the health-related benefits of regular physical activity. While physical activity questionnaires are easy to use, their accuracy in comparison to objective measures has been questioned. The purpose of the present study was to examine the utility of two interview-based questionnaires; a recently-developed instrument, the Simple Physical Activity Questionnaire (SIMPAQ), and the Seven Day-Physical Activity Recall (7DPAR).

methodsAccelerometer data was collected in 72 university students (50% females). Telephone interviews were conducted to complete the SIMPAQ and the 7DPAR.

resultsSignificant correlations (p < .001) were found between accelerometer-based moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), the amount of self-reported moderate-to-vigorous exercise assessed via the SIMPAQ (rho = .49), and vigorous physical activity assessed via the 7DPAR (rho = .50). Exercise assessed via the SIMPAQ was significantly correlated with the vigorous physical activity score of the 7DPAR (rho = .56, p < .001). While participants needed three minutes less to complete the SIMPAQ (p < .001), participants tended to be more confident about the accuracy of the answers they provided on the 7DPAR (p < .01).

conclusionsThese two questionnaire measures of physical activity performed similarly in a healthy young adult sample. The SIMPAQ can be completed in 15 minutes, which could be an advantage in settings where time for physical activity assessment is limited.

Indexed as

AccelerometryAdultExerciseFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesWearable Electronic DevicesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30192832
PMCPMC6128548
OpenAlexW2891112106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.