ArticlePloS one2018
Angioarchitecture and hemodynamics of microvascular arterio-venous malformations.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hemodynamic Characterization of Peripheral Arterio-Venous Malformations Using Rapid Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging: An In Vitro and In Vivo Study.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- 3D bioprinted multilayered cerebrovascular conduits to study cancer extravasation mechanism related with vascular geometry.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Cardiac and Hemodynamic Manifestations of Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia.The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2022Review
- A Computational Framework for Pre-Interventional Planning of Peripheral Arteriovenous Malformations.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2022Article
- Preoperative embolization of high-flow peripheral AVMs using plug and push technique with low-density NBCA/Lipiodol.Journal of surgical case reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionArteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are characterized by pathological high flow, low resistance connections between arteries and veins. Treatment is critically dependent on correct interpretation of angioarchitectural features. However, some microfistular AVMs do not match the characteristics described in current AVM classification systems. Therefore, we propose a new subgroup of microfistular AVMs, composed of enlarged, fistulous paths on the venous half of capillaries and/or dilated draining venules (hyperdynamic, capillary-venulous malformation [CV-AVM]). CV-AVMs still ensure arterial flow to the periphery and fistulous venous drainage is less pronounced than in classical AVMs such that these lesions are often misinterpreted as venous malformations. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe developed a computational model to study the effects of microvascular anomalies on local hemodynamics, as well as their impact on angiographic contrast propagation. Flow rates and pressures were computed with a lumped parameter description, while contrast propagation was determined by solving the 1D advection-diffusion equation. RESULTS AND
conclusionsFor the newly proposed CV-AVM angioarchitecture, the computational model predicts increased arterio-venous contrast agent transit times and highly dispersive transport characteristics, compared to microfistular, interstitial type IV AVMs and high flow type II and III AVMs. We related these findings to time-contrast intensity curves sampled from clinical angiographies and found that there is strong evidence for the existence of CV-AVM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.