Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30192786›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2018

Classes of depression symptom trajectories in patients with major depression receiving a collaborative care intervention.

Juliana J Petersen, Johannes Hartig, Michael A Paulitsch, Manuel Pagitz, Karola Mergenthal, Sandra Rauck, Andreas Reif, Ferdinand M Gerlach, Jochen Gensichen

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Juliana J PetersenInstitute of General Practice, Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4960-3673
Johannes HartigDepartment of Educational Quality and Evaluation, German Institute for International Educational Research, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Michael A PaulitschInstitute of General Practice, Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Manuel PagitzInstitute of General Practice, Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Karola MergenthalInstitute of General Practice, Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Sandra RauckInstitute of General Practice, Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Andreas ReifDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Ferdinand M GerlachInstitute of General Practice, Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Jochen GensichenInstitute of General Practice, Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCollaborative care is effective in improving symptoms of patients with depression. The aims of this study were to characterize symptom trajectories in patients with major depression during one year of collaborative care and to explore associations between baseline characteristics and symptom trajectories.

methodsWe conducted a cluster-randomized controlled trial in primary care. The collaborative care intervention comprised case management and behavioral activation. We used the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) to assess symptom severity as the primary outcome. Statistical analyses comprised latent growth mixture modeling and a hierarchical binary logistic regression model.

resultsWe included 74 practices and 626 patients (310 intervention and 316 control recipients) at baseline. Based on a minimum of 12 measurement points for each intervention recipient, we identified two latent trajectories, which we labeled 'fast improvers' (60.5%) and 'slow improvers' (39.5%). At all measurements after baseline, 'fast improvers' presented higher PHQ mean values than 'slow improvers'. At baseline, 'fast improvers' presented fewer physical conditions, higher health-related quality of life, and had made fewer suicide attempts in their history.

conclusionsA notable proportion of 39.5% of patients improved only 'slowly' and probably needed more intense treatment. The third follow-up in month two could well be a sensible time to adjust treatment to support 'slow improvers'.

Indexed as

Patient Care TeamAdultAgedCluster AnalysisDepressionFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID30192786
PMCPMC6128457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.