Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30192783›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Towards improved health service quality in Tanzania: An approach to increase efficiency and effectiveness of routine supportive supervision.

Sabine Renggli, Iddy Mayumana, Dominick Mboya, Christopher Charles, Justin Maeda, Christopher Mshana, Flora Kessy, Fabrizio Tediosi, Constanze Pfeiffer, Alexander Schulze and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sabine RenggliSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8233-6154
Iddy MayumanaIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam/Ifakara, United Republic of Tanzania.
Dominick MboyaIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam/Ifakara, United Republic of Tanzania.
Christopher CharlesIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam/Ifakara, United Republic of Tanzania.
Justin MaedaAfrica Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (Africa CDC), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Christopher MshanaIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam/Ifakara, United Republic of Tanzania.
Flora KessyIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam/Ifakara, United Republic of Tanzania.
Fabrizio TediosiSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Constanze PfeifferSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Alexander SchulzeSwiss Agency for Development and Cooperation, Berne, Switzerland.
Ann AertsNovartis Foundation, Basel, Switzerland.
Christian LengelerSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective supportive supervision of healthcare services is crucial for improving and maintaining quality of care. However, this process can be challenging in an environment with chronic shortage of qualified human resources, overburdened healthcare providers, multiple roles of district managers, weak supply chains, high donor fragmentation and inefficient allocation of limited financial resources. Operating in this environment, we systematically evaluated an approach developed in Tanzania to strengthen the implementation of routine supportive supervision of primary healthcare providers. The approach included a systematic quality assessment at health facilities using an electronic tool and subsequent result dissemination at council level. Mixed methods were used to compare the new supportive supervision approach with routine supportive supervision. Qualitative data was collected through in-depth interviews in three councils. Observational data and informal communication as well as secondary data complemented the data set. Additionally, an economic costing analysis was carried out in the same councils. Compared to routine supportive supervision, the new approach increased healthcare providers' knowledge and skills, as well as quality of data collected and acceptance of supportive supervision amongst stakeholders involved. It also ensured better availability of evidence for follow-up actions, including budgeting and planning, and higher stakeholder motivation and ownership of subsequent quality improvement measures. The new approach reduced time and cost spent during supportive supervision. This increased feasibility of supportive supervision and hence the likelihood of its implementation. Thus, the results presented together with previous findings suggested that if used as the standard approach for routine supportive supervision the new approach offers a suitable option to make supportive supervision more efficient and effective and therewith more sustainable. Moreover, the new approach also provides informed guidance to overcome several problems of supportive supervision and healthcare quality assessments in low- and middle income countries.

Indexed as

Costs and Cost AnalysisDelivery of Health CareHealth FacilitiesHumansQuality of Health CareTanzania

Identifiers

PMID30192783
PMCPMC6128487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.