Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30192386›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical pharmacology2019

Dose-Finding Studies Among Orphan Drugs Approved in the EU: A Retrospective Analysis.

Yvonne Schuller, Christine Gispen-de Wied, Carla E M Hollak, Hubertus G M Leufkens, Violeta Stoyanova-Beninska

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 91% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yvonne SchullerDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3736-939X
Christine Gispen-de WiedCollege ter Beoordeling Geneesmiddelen/Medicines Evaluation Board, Graadt van Roggenweg, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Carla E M HollakDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hubertus G M LeufkensDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Violeta Stoyanova-BeninskaCollege ter Beoordeling Geneesmiddelen/Medicines Evaluation Board, Graadt van Roggenweg, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLMedicines Evaluation Board · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the development process for new drugs, dose-finding studies are of major importance. Absence of these studies may lead to failed phase 3 trials and delayed marketing authorization. In our study we investigated to what extent dose-finding studies are performed in the case of orphan drugs for metabolic and oncologic indications. We identified all orphan drugs that were authorized until August 1, 2017. European Public Assessment Reports were used to extract the final dose used in the summary of product characteristics, involvement of healthy volunteers, study type, end points used, number of patients, number of doses, studies in special populations, and dose used for phase 3 studies. Each drug was checked for major objections and dose changes postmarketing. We included 49 orphan drugs, of which 28 were indicated for metabolic disorders and 21 for oncologic indications. Dose-finding studies were performed in 32 orphan drugs, and studies in healthy volunteers in 26. The absence of dose-finding studies was mostly due to the rarity of the disease. In this case the dose was determined based on factors such as animal studies or clinical experience. Dose-related major objections were raised for 9 orphan drugs. Postmarketing dose-finding studies were conducted in 18 orphan drugs, but dose changes were applied in only 2 drugs. In conclusion, dose-finding studies in the case of metabolic and oncologic orphan drugs were conducted in the development programs of two thirds of orphan drugs. Dose-finding studies performed postmarketing suggest that registered doses are not always optimal. It is thus important to perform more robust dose-finding studies both pre- and postmarketing.

Indexed as

Orphan Drug ProductionMetabolic DiseasesNeoplasmsPharmaceutical PreparationsRare DiseasesRetrospective StudiesPharmaceutical Preparationsdose findingorphan diseasesorphan drugs

Identifiers

PMID30192386
PMCPMC6585723
OpenAlexW2891600012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.