Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30192156›Full record

Trial reportJournal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics2018

The Diurnal and Nocturnal Effects of Pilocarpine on Intraocular Pressure in Patients Receiving Prostaglandin Analog Monotherapy.

Leonard K Seibold, Brandie D Wagner, Anne M Lynch, Malik Y Kahook

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. On indirect negative inotropic effects of muscarine in the isolated human atrium.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptors in the Retina-Therapeutic Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leonard K Seibold1 Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado School of Medicine , Aurora, Colorado.
Brandie D Wagner1 Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado School of Medicine , Aurora, Colorado.
Anne M Lynch1 Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado School of Medicine , Aurora, Colorado.
Malik Y Kahook1 Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado School of Medicine , Aurora, Colorado.
University of Colorado Denver · USColorado School of Public Health · US

Funding

Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUL1TR001082 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2013 to 2017
$48.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001082
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of the study was to determine the 24-h effects of pilocarpine 2% ophthalmic solution on intraocular pressure (IOP) and ocular perfusion pressure (OPP) when used in addition to prostaglandin analog (PGA) therapy.

methodsTwenty-seven patients with ocular hypertension (OHTN) or open angle glaucoma who were receiving stable monotherapy with a PGA were admitted to an inpatient sleep laboratory for 24-h monitoring of IOP, blood pressure (BP), and heart rate over 2 separate visits. The first baseline visit was performed under PGA monotherapy only. During the second 24-h visit, pilocarpine 2% was administered four times daily in addition to their normal PGA dosing. For each study visit, measurements of all study metrics were performed every 2 h in the habitual position. OPP was calculated as 2/3[diastolic BP +1/3(systolic BP - diastolic BP)] - IOP.

resultsDuring the diurnal period, pilocarpine significantly reduced IOP from a baseline of 18.2 ± 0.5 mmHg on PGA monotherapy to 17.1 ± 0.4 mmHg, P < 0.01. Similarly, pilocarpine significantly lowered IOP during the nocturnal period from 21.1 ± 0.7 to 20.0 ± 0.6 mmHg, P < 0.01. Mean OPP was unchanged from baseline levels after the addition of pilocarpine in both the diurnal and nocturnal periods. Mean systolic BP was significantly reduced during the nocturnal period only (-3.16 ± 1.5 mmHg, P = 0.03).

conclusionsIn patients taking PGA monotherapy, the addition of pilocarpine can significantly lower IOP throughout the diurnal and nocturnal periods, but has no effect on OPP.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGlaucomaHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedOcular HypertensionOphthalmic SolutionsPilocarpineProspective StudiesTonometry, OcularOphthalmic SolutionsPilocarpine24-hintraocular pressurenocturnalocular perfusion pressurepilocarpineprostaglandin analog

Identifiers

PMID30192156
PMCPMC6205087
OpenAlexW2891841311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.