Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30191866›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2018

Choosing Wisely at the End of Life: Use of Shorter Courses of Palliative Radiation Therapy for Bone Metastasis.

Audrey S Wallace, John B Fiveash, Courtney P Williams, Elizabeth Kvale, Maria Pisu, Bradford E Jackson, Gabrielle B Rocque

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Listening to the Patient Voice Adds Value to Cancer Clinical Trials.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Audrey S WallaceDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama. Electronic address: audreywallace@uabmc.edu.
John B FiveashDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Courtney P WilliamsDivision of Hematology and Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Elizabeth KvaleDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas, Austin, Texas.
Maria PisuDivision of Preventative Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Bradford E JacksonCenter for Outcomes Research, JPS Health Network, Fort Worth, Texas.
Gabrielle B RocqueDivision of Hematology and Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.

Funding

AHRQ HHS T32 HS013852
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAmerican Society for Radiation Choosing Wisely guidelines recommend ≤10 fractions of radiation therapy (RT) for bone metastasis, with consideration for 1 fraction in patients with a poor prognosis. The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate characteristic differences in guideline concordance to fractionation regimens in a modern cohort of older patients with a diagnosis of bone metastasis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years treated with RT for bone metastasis from 2012 to 2015 were identified. Guideline-concordant RT fractionation was defined in the entire cohort as ≤10 fractions. Utilization of 1 fraction versus ≥2 fractions was analyzed in deceased patients. Patient demographic, disease, and facility characteristics associated with shorter fractionation were analyzed.

resultsIn 569 patients treated with RT, the median age at diagnosis was 73 years. The most common cancer types were lung (37%), genitourinary (26%), breast (15%), and gastrointestinal (10%). Among all patients, 34%, 30%, and 36% received 1 fraction, 2 to 10 fractions, and ≥11 fractions, respectively. In comparison with receipt of 1 to 10 fractions, receipt of ≥11 fractions was associated with a $1467 increase in per-patient cost to Medicare during the calendar quarter of RT. Almost two-thirds of patients who died within 30 days of RT completion were treated with >1 fraction.

conclusionsAlthough guideline concordance was high overall, a large number of patients received longer courses of RT at the end of life. Strong consideration should be made for utilization of shorter courses, particularly in patients with a limited prognosis.

Indexed as

AgedBone NeoplasmsDose Fractionation, RadiationFemaleHumansMaleMedicarePalliative CareUnited States

Identifiers

PMID30191866
PMCPMC9706505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.