Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30191535›Full record

Observational studyInternal and emergency medicine2019

Influence of frailty on anticoagulant prescription and clinical outcomes after 1-year follow-up in hospitalised older patients with atrial fibrillation.

Alejandra Gullón, Francesc Formiga, Jesús Díez-Manglano, José María Mostaza, José María Cepeda, Antonio Pose, Jesús Castiella, Carmen Suárez-Fernández, NONAVASC study group Vascular Risk Group of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Internal and emergency medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Why and how do we measure frailty?Internal and emergency medicine · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Alejandra GullónInternal Medicine Department, University Hospital of La Princesa, Institute for Biomedical Research IIS-IPrincesa, C/Diego de León 62, 28006, Madrid, Spain. a.gullon.ojesto@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5728-9309
Francesc FormigaInternal Medicine Department, Geriatric Unit, University Hospital of Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Jesús Díez-ManglanoInternal Medicine Department, University Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain.
José María MostazaInternal Medicine Department, University Hospital of La Paz-Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
José María CepedaInternal Medicine Department, Hospital Vega Baja, Orihuela, Alicante, Spain.
Antonio PoseInternal Medicine Department, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Jesús CastiellaInternal Medicine Department, Fundación Hospital Calahorra, Calahorra, La Rioja, Spain.
Carmen Suárez-FernándezInternal Medicine Department, University Hospital of La Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
NONAVASC study group Vascular Risk Group of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine
Hospital Universitario de La Princesa · ESBellvitge University Hospital · ESHospital Universitario La Paz · ESUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Frailty is an important prognostic factor in older adults with cardiovascular diseases. We aim to describe the characteristics of elderly hospitalised frail patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and to assess the influence of frailty, along with other functional and health status variables on anticoagulation prescription, 1-year all-cause mortality, and the incidence of ischemic and bleeding complications. An observational, prospective multicentre study was carried out on patients with NVAF over the age of 75, who were admitted to the Internal Medicine departments in Spain. A total of 615 patients were evaluated (mean age 85.23 ± 5.16 years, 54.3% females, 48.3% frail). Frail patients had higher CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores, more comorbidities and worse functional status and cognitive impairment compared to non-frail. During hospitalisation, 58 (9.4%) patients died (12.5% frail, 6.6% non-frail, p = 0.01). Among the participants discharged, 69.8% received anticoagulants, 13% anti-platelets only and 16.9% no anti-thrombotics, with no difference by frailty status. Frailty is not a predictor of anticoagulant prescription at discharge (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.55-1.57), while functional dependency remains significantly associated (OR for severe dependency 0.44, 95% CI 0.23-0.82). After the 1-year follow-up, frail patients have a higher risk of death (HR 1.99, 95% CI 1.43-2.76). Among patients taking anticoagulants, the incidence of stroke and major bleeding is similar between frailty groups. In our study, frailty is related to worse global health status. It has no impact on antithrombotic prescription, nor is a predictor of AF complications, even though frail subjects have a higher mortality during hospitalisation and after 1-year follow-up.

Indexed as

Frail ElderlyHospitalizationAgedAged, 80 and overAnticoagulantsAtrial FibrillationCause of DeathComorbidityFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansMalePrognosisProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsAnticoagulantsAgedAnticoagulantsAntithrombotic therapyAtrial fibrillationElderlyFrailty

Identifiers

PMID30191535
OpenAlexW2891299303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.