ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2019
Gradual formation of visual working memory representations of motion directions.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Event Number and Duration in Time-Compressed Memory Replay.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2025Article
- Prediction of time to contact under perceptual and contextual uncertainties.Journal of vision · 2024Article
- Material constancy in perception and working memory.Journal of vision · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although it is well accepted that the formation of visual working memory (VWM) representations from simple static features is a rapid and effortless process that completes within several hundred milliseconds, the storage of motion information in VWM within that time scale can be challenging due to the limited processing capacity of the visual system. Memory formation can also be demanding especially when motion stimuli are visually complex. Here, we investigated whether the formation of VWM representations of motion direction is more gradual than that of static orientation and examined the effects of stimulus complexity on that process. To address these issues, we examined how the number and the precision of stored items in VWM develop over time by using a continuous report procedure. Results showed that while a viewing duration of several seconds was required for the successful storage of multiple motion directions in VWM regardless of motion complexity, the accumulation of memory precision was much slower when the motion stimulus was visually complex (Experiments 1 & 2). Additional experiments showed that the difference in memory performance for simple and complex motion stimuli cannot be explained by differences in signal-to-noise levels of the stimulus (Experiment 3). These results demonstrate remarkable temporal limitations in the formation of VWM representations for dynamic objects, and further show how this process is affected by stimulus properties such as visual complexity and signal-to-noise levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30191475What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.