ArticleBulletin of mathematical biology2018
Reproducible Research Using Biomodels.
Article in Bulletin of mathematical biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- From FAIR to CURE: guidelines for computational models of biological systems.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Review
- A scoping review of mathematical modeling techniques for gingival keratinization: A framework for periodontal research.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2025Review
- ENCORE: a practical implementation to improve reproducibility and transparency of computational research.Nature communications · 2024Article
- A Kinetic Approach to Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity (ORAC): Restoring Order to the Antioxidant Activity of Hydroxycinnamic Acids and Fruit Juices.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Reproducibility and FAIR principles: the case of a segment polarity network model.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Article
- Article
- VeVaPy, a Python Platform for Efficient Verification and Validation of Systems Biology Models with Demonstrations Using Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis Models.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Computational models in systems biology: standards, dissemination, and best practices.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2022Review
- Validation Through Collaboration: Encouraging Team Efforts to Ensure Internal and External Validity of Computational Models of Biochemical Pathways.Neuroinformatics · 2022Review
- Agent Based Models of Polymicrobial Biofilms and the Microbiome-A Review.Microorganisms · 2021Review
- Reproducibility in systems biology modelling.Molecular systems biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Like other types of computational research, modeling and simulation of biological processes (biomodels) is still largely communicated without sufficient detail to allow independent reproduction of results. But reproducibility in this area of research could easily be achieved by making use of existing resources, such as supplying models in standard formats and depositing code, models, and results in public repositories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.