Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30191421›Full record

Trial reportClinical rheumatology2018

Efficacy of certolizumab pegol with and without concomitant use of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs over 4 years in psoriatic arthritis patients: results from the RAPID-PsA randomized controlled trial.

J A Walsh, A B Gottlieb, B Hoepken, T Nurminen, P J Mease

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical rheumatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT01087788 (Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Certolizumab Pegol in Subjects With Adult-Onset Active and Progressive Psoriatic Arthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01087788 phase3completednot on this map

Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Certolizumab Pegol in Subjects With Adult-Onset Active and Progressive Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUCB BIOSCIENCES GmbHRan2010 to 2015Enrolled409ConditionsArthritis, PsoriaticArmsCZP 200 mg Q2W, CZP 400 mg Q4W, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors for psoriatic arthritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Monotherapy or combination therapy in PsA: current aspects.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2024
    Review
  8. Infections in psoriatic arthritis: association with treatment.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

J A WalshDivision of Rheumatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. jessica.walsh@hsc.utah.edu.
A B GottliebDepartment of Dermatology, New York Medical College, Metropolitan Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
B HoepkenUCB Pharma, Monheim, Germany.
T NurminenUCB Pharma, Monheim, Germany.
P J MeaseSwedish Medical Center and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
UCB Pharma (Germany) · DEMetropolitan Hospital Center · USSwedish Medical Center · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To report long-term efficacy of certolizumab pegol (CZP) treatment with and without concomitant DMARDs in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). RAPID-PsA (NCT01087788) was double-blind and placebo-controlled to week 24, dose-blind to week 48, and open-label to week 216. Patients had active PsA with ≥ 1 failed DMARD. At baseline, patients were randomized 1:1:1 to CZP 200 mg every 2 weeks: CZP 400 mg every 4 weeks: placebo. CZP-randomized patients continued their dose into open-label. Observed case efficacy data are reported to week 216 for week 0 CZP-randomized patients (dose combined) with and without baseline DMARD use (DMARD+/DMARD-). Dactylitis (tenderness and ≥ 10% difference in swelling between affected and opposite digits) and enthesitis were measured using Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) and Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI). 273/409 randomized patients received CZP from baseline: 199/273 (72.9%) DMARD+ and 74/273 (27.1%) DMARD- patients. 141/199 (70.9%) DMARD+ and 42/74 (56.8%) DMARD- patients completed Week 216. DMARD+ (79.7%) and 83.3% of DMARD- patients achieved ACR20 response at week 216; 79.2 and 78.1% achieved 75% improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI75). High proportions of DMARD+/DMARD- patients with extra-articular manifestations at baseline reported total resolution at week 216; dactylitis 91.4% of DMARD+ and 93.3% of DMARD- patients, enthesitis 74.4% of DMARD+ and 87.5% of DMARD- patients. Long-term improvements in PsA symptoms were observed with CZP monotherapy or concomitant DMARDs, across important psoriatic disease domains, including joint disease, psoriasis, nail disease, dactylitis, and enthesitis.Trial registration: NCT01087788.

Indexed as

AdultAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, PsoriaticArthritis, RheumatoidCertolizumab PegolC-Reactive ProteinDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFingersHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsJoint DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPatient SafetyAntirheumatic AgentsCertolizumab PegolC-Reactive ProteinImmunosuppressive AgentsAnti-TNFCertolizumab pegolDMARDEfficacyPsoriatic arthritis

Identifiers

PMID30191421
OpenAlexW2891921426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.