Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30191352›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2018

Adjusted regularization of cortical covariance.

Giuseppe Vinci, Valérie Ventura, Matthew A Smith, Robert E Kass

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Latent Dynamic Factor Analysis of High-Dimensional Neural Recordings.Advances in neural information processing systems · 2020
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Giuseppe VinciDepartment of Statistics, Rice University, 6100 Main St, Houston, TX, 77005, USA. giuseppe.vinci@rice.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2783-8420
Valérie VenturaDepartment of Statistics & Data Science, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Matthew A SmithDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh, Eye and Ear Institute, 203 Lothrop St., Room 914, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Robert E KassDepartment of Statistics & Data Science, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.

Funding

Virus Production and Manipulation of Protein/Gene Expression ModuleP30EY008098 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Ethan A Rossi · 1989 to 2026
$17.8M
Diversity supplement to Analysis of Nonstationary Point Process DataR01MH064537 · NIMH · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI KASS, ROBERT E · 2001 to 2024
$7.2M
Interdiscplinary Training in Computational NeuroscienceR90DA023426 · NIDA · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI KASS, ROBERT E, RUBIN, JONATHAN E. · 2006 to 2020
$4.5M
Slow time scale fluctuations in neurons and behaviorR01MH128393 · NIMH · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI MATTHEW A SMITH · 2022 to 2026
$2.2M
Dynamic Mechanisms of active vision in prefrontal cortexR01EY022928 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SMITH, MATTHEW A · 2014 to 2018
$1.9M
CRCNS: Interhemispheric coordination for memory and actionR01NS147766 · NINDS · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI Joseph Patrick Mayo, MATTHEW A SMITH · 2025 to 2026
$750k
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY008098NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022928NIDA NIH HHS R90 DA023426NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH064537NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH128393NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS147766
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is now common to record dozens to hundreds or more neurons simultaneously, and to ask how the network activity changes across experimental conditions. A natural framework for addressing questions of functional connectivity is to apply Gaussian graphical modeling to neural data, where each edge in the graph corresponds to a non-zero partial correlation between neurons. Because the number of possible edges is large, one strategy for estimating the graph has been to apply methods that aim to identify large sparse effects using an [Formula: see text] penalty. However, the partial correlations found in neural spike count data are neither large nor sparse, so techniques that perform well in sparse settings will typically perform poorly in the context of neural spike count data. Fortunately, the correlated firing for any pair of cortical neurons depends strongly on both their distance apart and the features for which they are tuned. We introduce a method that takes advantage of these known, strong effects by allowing the penalty to depend on them: thus, for example, the connection between pairs of neurons that are close together will be penalized less than pairs that are far apart. We show through simulations that this physiologically-motivated procedure performs substantially better than off-the-shelf generic tools, and we illustrate by applying the methodology to populations of neurons recorded with multielectrode arrays implanted in macaque visual cortex areas V1 and V4.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAction PotentialsAlgorithmsAnimalsComputer SimulationInteratrial BlockMacaca mulattaNerve NetNeural PathwaysNeuronsPhotic StimulationROC CurveVisual CortexVisual PerceptionBayesian inferenceFalse discovery rateFunctional connectivityGaussian graphical modelGraphical lassoHigh-dimensional estimationMacaque visual cortexPenalized maximum likelihood estimation

Identifiers

PMID30191352
PMCPMC6195462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.