Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30191326›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2018

Identification of saprophytic and allergenic fungi in indoor and outdoor environments.

Ardeshir Ziaee, Mohammadali Zia, Mohammad Goli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Metabarcode insights into the airborne fungal diversity in the indoor and outdoor environments in archives from Yunnan, Southwestern China.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Invasive Aspergillosis of Nose and Paranasal Sinus in COVID-19 Convalescents: Mold Goes Viral?Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2022
    Article
  8. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ardeshir ZiaeeDepartment of Medical and Veterinary Mycology, Faculty of Veterinary Specialized Sciences, Sciences and Researches Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammadali ZiaDepartment of Basic Sciences, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran. Zia.mohammadali@gmail.com.
Mohammad GoliDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The airborne spores of some saprophytic and allergenic fungi such as Aspergillus, Alternaria, and Cladosporium are found throughout the world and exposure to these agents may result in various types of allergic diseases. The aim of this study, therefore, was to investigate the frequency of different saprophytic, allergenic, and pathogenic fungi in indoor and outdoor environments. During a 6-month period, 780 samples were obtained from a number of houses, mosques, parks, public restrooms, grocery stores, laboratories, and hospitals. An open-plate method was applied for air sampling by exposing 90-mm plates containing chloramphenicol/potato dextrose agar and malt extract agar were exposed to air for 30 min. Alternatively, the sampling from surfaces was performed using sterile wet swab and tape-stripe method. All samples were then inoculated in media and incubated at 28 °C for 2-3 weeks. The isolated fungi were purified in order to detect the genus, and if possible, species level of the targeted fungi based on morphological and microscopic features using standard methods. The findings revealed that the dominant indoor and outdoor fungal species were Aspergillus, Penicillium, and Cladosporium whose frequency values were 16.42%, 16.17%, and 14.92% respectively. The lowest frequency was related to Acrophialophora and Madurella (0.25%). More notably, the results for air and surface were similar. It was also found out that the three dominant genera were Aspergillus (16.53%), Penicillium (15.50%), and Cladosporium (11.93%), with Basidiobolus and Acrophialophora having the lowest frequency. It was observed that different environmental spaces have a great bearing on the spreading of such allergic agents, especially in subtropical humid climates.

Indexed as

Air MicrobiologyAir Pollution, IndoorAllergensAlternariaAspergillusCladosporiumEnvironmental MonitoringHypersensitivityPenicilliumSpores, FungalAllergensAirborne fungiAllergenic fungiIndoor and outdoor airSaprophytic fungi

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.