ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2018
Identification of saprophytic and allergenic fungi in indoor and outdoor environments.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diversity of Fungi Associated with Diseases of Cultivated Brassicaceae in Southern Italy.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Molecular identification, antibiotic susceptibility, and biofilm formation of airborne bacteria.AMB Express · 2025Article
- Occurrence of Pathogenic and Allergenic Molds in the Outdoor and Indoor Environment of a Major Hospital and Molecular Epidemiology ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Metabarcode insights into the airborne fungal diversity in the indoor and outdoor environments in archives from Yunnan, Southwestern China.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024Article
- The changing trend of fungal infection in invasive rhinosinusitis in the COVID era.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2024Article
- Indoor environment assessment of special wards of educational hospitals for the detection of fungal contamination sources: A multi-center study (2019-2021).Current medical mycology · 2022Article
- Invasive Aspergillosis of Nose and Paranasal Sinus in COVID-19 Convalescents: Mold Goes Viral?Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2022Article
- Review
- Fungal Diversity in Two Wastewater Treatment Plants in North Italy.Microorganisms · 2022Article
- Contribution of Visible Surface Mold to Airborne Fungal Concentration as Assessed by Digital Image Quantification.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Airborne fungi in Universiti Sains Malaysia: knowledge, density and diversity.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2021Article
- Molecular, physiological, and biochemical characterization of extracellular lipase production byPeerJ · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The airborne spores of some saprophytic and allergenic fungi such as Aspergillus, Alternaria, and Cladosporium are found throughout the world and exposure to these agents may result in various types of allergic diseases. The aim of this study, therefore, was to investigate the frequency of different saprophytic, allergenic, and pathogenic fungi in indoor and outdoor environments. During a 6-month period, 780 samples were obtained from a number of houses, mosques, parks, public restrooms, grocery stores, laboratories, and hospitals. An open-plate method was applied for air sampling by exposing 90-mm plates containing chloramphenicol/potato dextrose agar and malt extract agar were exposed to air for 30 min. Alternatively, the sampling from surfaces was performed using sterile wet swab and tape-stripe method. All samples were then inoculated in media and incubated at 28 °C for 2-3 weeks. The isolated fungi were purified in order to detect the genus, and if possible, species level of the targeted fungi based on morphological and microscopic features using standard methods. The findings revealed that the dominant indoor and outdoor fungal species were Aspergillus, Penicillium, and Cladosporium whose frequency values were 16.42%, 16.17%, and 14.92% respectively. The lowest frequency was related to Acrophialophora and Madurella (0.25%). More notably, the results for air and surface were similar. It was also found out that the three dominant genera were Aspergillus (16.53%), Penicillium (15.50%), and Cladosporium (11.93%), with Basidiobolus and Acrophialophora having the lowest frequency. It was observed that different environmental spaces have a great bearing on the spreading of such allergic agents, especially in subtropical humid climates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30191326What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.