Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30191275›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2019

Multiplex PCR Unyvero i60 ITI application improves detection of low-virulent microorganisms in periprosthetic joint infections.

Irene Katharina Sigmund, Reinhard Windhager, Florian Sevelda, Kevin Staats, Stephan Engelbert Puchner, Sandra Stenicka, Florian Thalhammer, Johannes Holinka

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Diagnosing Fracture-Related Infections: Where Are We Now?Journal of clinical microbiology · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Ruling out underlying infection in 200 presumed aseptic knee and hip revision arthroplasties using a multiplex PCR system.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Irene Katharina SigmundDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090, Vienna, Austria. irene.sigmund@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0002-5068-2738
Reinhard WindhagerDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Florian SeveldaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Kevin StaatsDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Stephan Engelbert PuchnerDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Sandra StenickaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Florian ThalhammerDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Division of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Johannes HolinkaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · ATSigmund Freud Privatuniversität Wien · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the pre-operative performance of an automated multiplex PCR (mPCR) system in patients with suspected periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).

methodsUnder sterile conditions, synovial fluid samples from patients with a suspected PJI were collected pre-operatively. One hundred eighty microliter of the aspirate was used for analysis in the mPCR. The remaining joint fluid was sent for microbiological analysis. PJI was diagnosed by using the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria. Total percentage agreement and Cohen's kappa coefficient were calculated to measure overall agreement.

resultsOverall, 90 patients with a suspected PJI were included. Using MSIS criteria, 38 (42%) patients were classified as septic. Total percent agreement between mPCR and synovial fluid culture was 86% with a Cohen's kappa of 0.68. The mPCR and synovial fluid culture showed sensitivities of 71% and 84%, respectively. Combined evaluation provided an even higher sensitivity of 92%. While Cutibacterium spp. were detected five times by mPCR, it could only be cultured once. A higher detection rate of CoNS by mPCR (n = 7) compared to conventional culture (n = 5) was also demonstrated. In comparison to synovial fluid culture, the mPCR missed Staphylococcus aureus five times.

conclusionWith a moderate agreement between synovial fluid mPCR and culture, the mPCR system could be a useful adjunct in diagnosing a PJI pre-operatively. Due to faster availability of results and a higher detection rate of low-virulent microorganisms, it can complement conventional culture.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBacteriological TechniquesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionPreoperative CareProsthesis-Related InfectionsSensitivity and SpecificitySynovial FluidDiagnosisLow-grade infectionsLow-virulent microorganismsMultiplex PCR systemPeriprosthetic joint infection

Identifiers

PMID30191275
PMCPMC6647720
OpenAlexW2892348024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.