Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30191261›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2018

Adaptation to visual feedback delays on touchscreens with hand vision.

Elie Cattan, Pascal Perrier, François Bérard, Silvain Gerber, Amélie Rochet-Capellan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elie CattanUniv. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble-INP, LIG, 38000, Grenoble, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2031-4352
Pascal PerrierUniv. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble-INP, Gipsa-Lab, 38000, Grenoble, France.
François BérardUniv. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble-INP, LIG, 38000, Grenoble, France.
Silvain GerberUniv. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble-INP, Gipsa-Lab, 38000, Grenoble, France.
Amélie Rochet-CapellanUniv. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble-INP, Gipsa-Lab, 38000, Grenoble, France. amelie.rochet-capellan@grenoble-inp.fr.

Funding

LabEx PERSYVAL-Lab ANR-11-LABX-0025-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Direct touch finger interaction on a smartphone or a tablet is now ubiquitous. However, the latency inherent in digital computation produces an average feedback delay of ~ 75 ms between the action of the hand and its visible effect on digital content. This delay has been shown to affect users' performance, but it is unclear whether users adapt to this delay and whether it influences skill learning. Previous work studied adaptation to feedback delays but only for longer delays, with hidden hand or indirect devices. This paper addresses adaptation to touchscreen delay in two empirical studies involving the tracking of a target moving along an elliptical path. Participants were trained for the task either at the minimal delay the system allows (~ 9 ms) or at a longer delay equivalent to commercialized touch devices latencies (75 ms). After 10 training sessions over a minimum of 2 weeks (Experiment 1), participants adapt to the delay. They also display long-term retention 7 weeks after the last training session. This adaptation generalizes to a similar tracking path (e.g., infinity symbol). We also observed generalization of learning from the longer delay to the minimal-delay condition (Experiment 2). The delay thus does not prevent the learning of tracking skill, which suggests that delay adaptation and tracking skill could be two separate components of learning.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalAdultAlgorithmsFeedback, SensoryFemaleFingersGeneralization, PsychologicalHumansLearningMaleMiddle AgedMotor SkillsPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeTouchVision, OcularDirect touch interactionMotor adaptationMotor learningTrackingVisual feedback delay

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.