Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30191216›Full record

ArticleThe Analyst2018

Small volume method for drug release screening using ultrasonic agitation.

Andrew J Acevedo, R Glynn Holt, Darash Desai, Muhammad H Zaman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Analyst, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew J AcevedoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA. zaman@bu.edu.
R Glynn Holt
Darash Desai
Muhammad H Zaman

Funding

Translational Research in BiomaterialsT32EB006359 · NIBIB · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI MARK W. GRINSTAFF, Michelle H Teplensky · 2009 to 2026
$4.2M
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB006359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug release testing plays a major role along all parts of the dosage form development and manufacturing process. However, official methods to perform this type of testing are often resource intensive and require highly specialized facilities. Affordable and accessible methods for studying drug release behavior are currently lacking. This work presents a small volume approach to solid dissolution and drug release testing of solid dosage forms using ultrasonic agitation. Cavitation and acoustic streaming were generated by a microprobe horn delivering a 40 kHz acoustic signal into a 50 mL test vessel. These two phenomena resulted in breakdown of and release of drug from tablet samples. Prednisone Performance Verification Tablets were used as model tablets to study the effect of system parameters on the drug release process. The effects of these parameters on the acousto-hydrodynamic environment were studied using streak photography and hydrophone measurements. Drug release behavior showed a slow/fast threshold transition separated by a highly variable regime as a function of the system parameters. Observations from drug release experiments and results from acoust-hydrodynamic characterization experiments suggested that this transition is dominated by acoustic streaming. This method represents a screening method to probe relative differences in dosage form composition and acts as a complimentary approach to official testing methods. The small volume format of this test has potential applications in the study of drug release properties from low-dose and novel solid dosage forms as well as reduced cost and increased accessibility of release testing for post-manufacturing tablet quality screening, a current need in low- and middle-income countries.

Indexed as

Drug LiberationUltrasonicsPrednisoneSolubilityTabletsPrednisoneTablets

Identifiers

PMID30191216
PMCPMC6983327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.