ArticleScience advances2018
Leg force interference in polypedal locomotion.
Article in Science advances, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nature's All-in-One: Multitasking Robots Inspired by Dung Beetles.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- The Smooth Transition From Many-Legged to Bipedal Locomotion-Gradual Leg Force Reduction and its Impact on Total Ground Reaction Forces, Body Dynamics and Gait Transitions.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Article
- Integrative Biomimetics of Autonomous Hexapedal Locomotion.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2019Article
- Locomotion of Ants Walking up Slippery Slopes of Granular Materials.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The examination of gaits and gait changes has been the focus of movement physiology and legged robot engineering since the first emergence of the fields. While most examinations have focused on bipedal and quadrupedal designs, many robotic implementations rely on the higher static stability of three or more pairs of legs. Thus far, however, the effect of number of pairs of legs on locomotion dynamics has not been examined. Accordingly, the present approach aims to extend available theory to polypedal designs and examines how the number of active walking legs affects body dynamics when combined with changing duty factors and phase relations. The model shows that ground force interference of higher numbers of active pairs of walking legs can prevent effective use of bouncing gaits, such as trot, and their associated advantages, such as energy efficiency, because significantly higher degrees of leg synchronization are required. It also shows that small changes in the leg coordination pattern have a much higher impact on the center-of-mass dynamics in locomotor systems with many legs than in those with fewer legs. In this way, the model reveals coordinative constraints for specific gaits facilitating the assessment of animal locomotion and economization of robotic locomotion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.