Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30191172›Full record

ArticleScience advances2018

Ancient genome-wide analyses infer kinship structure in an Early Medieval Alemannic graveyard.

Niall O'Sullivan, Cosimo Posth, Valentina Coia, Verena J Schuenemann, T Douglas Price, Joachim Wahl, Ron Pinhasi, Albert Zink, Johannes Krause, Frank Maixner

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The persistence and loss of hard selective sweeps amid admixture in ancient Eurasians.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Global patterns of natural selection inferred using ancient DNA.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Descent, marriage, and residence practices of a 3,800-year-old pastoral community in Central Eurasia.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Niall O'SullivanInstitute for Mummy Studies, EURAC Research, Viale Druso 1, 39100 Bolzano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3840-4292
Cosimo PosthMax Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Kahlaische Strasse 10, 07745 Jena, Germany.
Valentina CoiaInstitute for Mummy Studies, EURAC Research, Viale Druso 1, 39100 Bolzano, Italy.
Verena J SchuenemannInstitute for Archaeological Sciences, University of Tübingen, Rümelinstrasse 23, 72070 Tübingen, Germany.
T Douglas PriceLaboratory for Archaeological Chemistry, University of Wisconsin, 1180 Observatory Drive, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Joachim WahlState Office for Cultural Heritage Management Baden-Württemberg, Osteology, D-78467 Konstanz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5733-8905
Ron PinhasiSchool of Archaeology and Earth Institute, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.
Albert ZinkInstitute for Mummy Studies, EURAC Research, Viale Druso 1, 39100 Bolzano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1461-747X
Johannes KrauseMax Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Kahlaische Strasse 10, 07745 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9144-3920
Frank MaixnerInstitute for Mummy Studies, EURAC Research, Viale Druso 1, 39100 Bolzano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2846-8994

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From historical and archeological records, it is posited that the European medieval household was a combination of close relatives and recruits. However, this kinship structure has not yet been directly tested at a genomic level on medieval burials. The early 7th century CE burial at Niederstotzingen, discovered in 1962, is the most complete and richest example of Alemannic funerary practice in Germany. Excavations found 13 individuals who were buried with an array of inscribed bridle gear, jewelry, armor, and swords. These artifacts support the view that the individuals had contact with France, northern Italy, and Byzantium. This study analyzed genome-wide sequences recovered from the remains, in tandem with analysis of the archeological context, to reconstruct kinship and the extent of outside contact. Eleven individuals had sufficient DNA preservation to genetically sex them as male and identify nine unique mitochondrial haplotypes and two distinct Y chromosome lineages. Genome-wide analyses were performed on eight individuals to estimate genetic affiliation to modern west Eurasians and genetic kinship at the burial. Five individuals were direct relatives. Three other individuals were not detectably related; two of these showed genomic affinity to southern Europeans. The genetic makeup of the individuals shares no observable pattern with their orientation in the burial or the cultural association of their grave goods, with the five related individuals buried with grave goods associated with three diverse cultural origins. These findings support the idea that not only were kinship and fellowship held in equal regard: Diverse cultural appropriation was practiced among closely related individuals as well.

Indexed as

CemeteriesDNA, MitochondrialArchaeologyFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyGermanyHaplotypesHistory, MedievalHumansMalePolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSex Determination AnalysisDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID30191172
PMCPMC6124919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.