Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30191078›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics2018

Colorectal cancer screening use among insured adults: Is out-of-pocket cost a barrier to routine screening?

Abhilash Perisetti, Hafiz Khan, Nayana E George, Rachana Yendala, Aamrin Rafiq, Summre Blakely, Drew Rasmussen, Nathan Villalpando, Hemant Goyal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs About Colorectal Cancer Screening in Puerto Rico.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. AHealth promotion practice · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Effects of the Affordable Care Act on the Receipt of Colonoscopies among the Insured Elderly.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Evolving Dynamics of Colorectal Cancer in High Socio-Demographic Regions.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Abhilash PerisettiDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, United States.
Hafiz KhanDepartment of Public Health, Texas Tech University Health Sciences, Lubbock, TX 79430, United States.
Nayana E GeorgeDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Arkansas Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, United States.
Rachana YendalaDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences, Lubbock, TX 79430, United States.
Aamrin RafiqDepartment of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, United States.
Summre BlakelySchool of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX 79430, United States.
Drew RasmussenDepartment of Public Health, Texas Tech University Health Sciences, Lubbock, TX 79430, United States.
Nathan VillalpandoDepartment of Public Health, Texas Tech University Health Sciences, Lubbock, TX 79430, United States.
Hemant GoyalDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mercer University School of Medicine, Macon, GA 31201, United States. doc.hemant@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo describe the characteristics of adults who needed to see a doctor in the past year but could not due to the extra cost and assess the impact of limited financial resources on the receipt of routine fecal occult blood test, sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy for colon cancer screening among insured patients.

methodsData obtained from the 2012 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System included 215436 insured adults age 50-75 years. We computed frequencies, adjusted odds ratios (aORs), and 95%CIs using SAS v9.3 software.

resultsNine percent of the study population needed to see a doctor in the past year but could not because of cost. The numbers were significantly higher among those aged 50-64 (

conclusionWe found that the limited financial resources within the past 12 mo were significantly associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) non-screening. Patients with risk factors identified in this study should adhere to CRC guidelines and should receive financial help if needed.

Indexed as

Access to careBehavioral Risk Factor Surveillance SystemColorectal cancerFecal occult bloodHealthcare deliveryScreeningSigmoidoscopy

Identifiers

PMID30191078
PMCPMC6125137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.