Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30191007›Full record

ReviewHepatic oncology2015

Biphenotypic (hepatobiliary) primary liver carcinomas: the work in progress.

Elizabeth M Brunt, Valerie Paradis, Christine Sempoux, Neil D Theise

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hepatic oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Look into hepatic progenitor cell associated trait: Histological heterogeneity of hepatitis B-related combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma.Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Medical sciences = Hua zhong ke ji da xue xue bao. Yi xue Ying De wen ban = Huazhong keji daxue xuebao. Yixue Yingdewen ban · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Pathology of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elizabeth M BruntDepartment of Pathology & Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Valerie ParadisDepartment of Pathology, Beaujon Hospital, 92118 Clichy, France.
Christine SempouxInstitute of Pathology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Neil D TheiseDepartments of Pathology & Medicine, Mount Sinai Beth Israel Medical Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10002, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent WHO classification for combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma and recognized stem cell subtypes has increased attention to such tumors; however, the resulting burst of reporting and research indicates that this classification, while provocative, is incomplete for description of the full array of primary liver carcinomas with biphenotypic (hepatobiliary) differentiation. We review the history of such lesions and consider the wider array of such tumors previously described. Mixed hepatobiliary phenotypes and immunophenotypes are found in individual tumors at the tissue level - with architectural and cytologic features supportive of both differentiation states - and at the cellular level, with individual cells that display cytology of one cell type, but immunophenotypically showing mixed expression. Pathobiologic and clinical questions to be answered by future research are suggested.

Indexed as

cholangiocarcinomacholangiolocellular carcinomacombined hepatocellular–cholangiocarcinomahepatocarcinogenesishepatocellular carcinomaliver progenitor cellliver stem cellmixed hepatobiliary carcinomaprimary liver carcinomastem cell tumorstemness

Identifiers

PMID30191007
PMCPMC6095308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.