Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30190953›Full record

ReviewHepatic oncology2014

Tivantinib in MET-high hepatocellular carcinoma patients and the ongoing Phase III clinical trial.

Lorenza Rimassa, Camillo Porta, Ivan Borbath, Bruno Daniele, Richard S Finn, Jean-Luc Raoul, Lawrence H Schwartz, Aiwu Ruth He, Joerg Trojan, Markus Peck-Radosavljevic and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hepatic oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Lorenza RimassaMedical Oncology & Hematology Unit, Cancer Center, Humanitas Clinical & Research Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Camillo PortaFondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, P.le Golgi 19, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Ivan BorbathCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, Brussels, 1200, Belgium.
Bruno DanieleG. Rummo Hospital, Via Dell'Angelo, 1, 82100, Benevento, Italy.
Richard S FinnDepartment of Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, 10833 Le Conte Avenue, CA, USA.
Jean-Luc RaoulPaoli-Calmettes Institute, 232 Boulevard de Sainte Marguerite, BP 156, Marseille Cedex 09, 13273, France.
Lawrence H SchwartzColumbia University, 180 Fort Washington Avenue, NY 10032, USA.
Aiwu Ruth HeGeorgetown University Hospital, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center; 3800 Reservoir Road NW, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.
Joerg TrojanKlinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7 Frankfurt am Main, 60590, Germany.
Markus Peck-RadosavljevicMedizinische Universitaet Wien, Abteilung fuer Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, Floor 6 P, Waehringer Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, 1090, Austria.
Giovanni AbbadessaArQule, Inc., 19 Presidential Way, Woburn, MA 01801, USA.
Terri GoldbergDaiichi-Sankyo, Inc, Edison, NJ 08837, USA.
Armando SantoroMedical Oncology & Hematology Unit, Cancer Center, Humanitas Clinical & Research Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Jordi BruixBarcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Group, Liver Unit, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is no available effective systemic treatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are intolerant of sorafenib or who have disease that has progressed on sorafenib. In Phase I and II studies, tivantinib (ARQ 197), an oral inhibitor of MET, demonstrated promising antitumor activity in patients with HCC, both as monotherapy and in combination with sorafenib. A randomized Phase II trial in second-line HCC showed improved overall survival (hazard ratio: 0.38; p = 0.01) in patients with MET-high tumors, as demonstrated by immunohistochemistry, treated with tivantinib versus placebo. Here we present the treatment rationale and study design of the METIV-HCC Phase III study. This randomized, double-blind study will investigate tivantinib monotherapy as second-line treatment in patients with advanced, pretreated, MET-high HCC. Approximately 303 patients will be randomized 2:1 to tivantinib or placebo for the purpose of analyzing the primary end point. Tivantinib will be dosed at 120 mg twice daily, and treatment will continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, patient or physician decision to discontinue, or death. The primary end point of this study is overall survival, while secondary end points include progression-free survival and safety. All patients will be tested for biomarkers. If the primary objective is achieved, this study will provide the first effective therapy for a biologically selected patient population in HCC.

Identifiers

PMID30190953
PMCPMC6095177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.