ReviewHepatic oncology2014
Tivantinib in MET-high hepatocellular carcinoma patients and the ongoing Phase III clinical trial.
Review in Hepatic oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Comprehensive Review on Cancer Vaccines and Vaccine Strategies in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Vaccines · 2023Review
- Review
- Selective Inhibitor of the c-Met Receptor Tyrosine Kinase in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: No Beneficial Effect With the Use of Tivantinib?Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- Evaluation of the pharmacokinetic drug interaction potential of tivantinib (ARQ 197) using cocktail probes in patients with advanced solid tumours.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2018Article
- The regulatory role of heparin on c-Met signaling in hepatocellular carcinoma cells.Journal of cell communication and signaling · 2017Article
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Therapeutic Guidelines and Medical Treatment.Liver cancer · 2016Review
- Clinical Development of c-MET Inhibition in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015Review
- Molecular classification of hepatocellular carcinoma: potential therapeutic implications.Hepatic oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is no available effective systemic treatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are intolerant of sorafenib or who have disease that has progressed on sorafenib. In Phase I and II studies, tivantinib (ARQ 197), an oral inhibitor of MET, demonstrated promising antitumor activity in patients with HCC, both as monotherapy and in combination with sorafenib. A randomized Phase II trial in second-line HCC showed improved overall survival (hazard ratio: 0.38; p = 0.01) in patients with MET-high tumors, as demonstrated by immunohistochemistry, treated with tivantinib versus placebo. Here we present the treatment rationale and study design of the METIV-HCC Phase III study. This randomized, double-blind study will investigate tivantinib monotherapy as second-line treatment in patients with advanced, pretreated, MET-high HCC. Approximately 303 patients will be randomized 2:1 to tivantinib or placebo for the purpose of analyzing the primary end point. Tivantinib will be dosed at 120 mg twice daily, and treatment will continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, patient or physician decision to discontinue, or death. The primary end point of this study is overall survival, while secondary end points include progression-free survival and safety. All patients will be tested for biomarkers. If the primary objective is achieved, this study will provide the first effective therapy for a biologically selected patient population in HCC.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.