Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30190930›Full record

ReviewMelanoma management2018

Advances in the use of reflectance confocal microscopy in melanoma.

Andréanne Waddell, Phoebe Star, Pascale Guitera

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Melanoma management, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Non-invasive tools in the diagnosis of melanoma: Reflectance confocal microscopy and pigmented lesion assay.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. New Technologies in Diagnosis and Prognosis of Melanocytic Lesions.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Andréanne WaddellMelanoma Institute Australia, The Poche Centre, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Phoebe StarMelanoma Institute Australia, The Poche Centre, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Pascale GuiteraMelanoma Institute Australia, The Poche Centre, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
University of Sydney · AUUniversité de Sherbrooke · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

algorithmconfocal microscopycutaneous oncologydiagnosisin vivo confocal microscopymappingmelanomamelanoma subtypenoninvasive skin imagingpathology correlations

Identifiers

PMID30190930
PMCPMC6122529
OpenAlexW2800356704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.