Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30190869›Full record

ReviewMelanoma management2016

Low-dose brachytherapy strategies to treat uveal melanoma: is less more?

Patrick Oellers, Prithvi Mruthyunjaya

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Melanoma management, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 98% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Innovations in brachytherapy.Taiwan journal of ophthalmology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Patrick OellersDepartment of Ophthalmology, Duke University Medical School, Durham, NC, USA.
Prithvi MruthyunjayaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Duke University Medical School, Durham, NC, USA.
Duke University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) has established equivalency of globe salvaging brachytherapy compared with enucleation in terms of survival for medium-sized choroidal melanoma. The radiation dose protocol followed by the COMS was 85 Gray to a prescription point of the tumor apex or 5 mm inner sclera; whichever was greater. While the COMS realized appropriate local and distant tumor control rates, ocular morbidity due to radiation complications remains a significant clinical challenge. Recent studies challenge the COMS radiation dose paradigm by demonstrating similar tumor control by utilizing lower radiation doses that are associated with reduced radiation toxicity. Improved operative techniques including intraoperative ultrasound can aid to obtain adequate radiation delivery to the tumor by ensuring optimal plaque position. Adjuvant transpupillary thermotherapy, intravitreal anti-VEGF and posterior sub-Tenon steroids may further enhance outcome by providing additional tumor control and/or facilitating visual recovery.

Indexed as

anti-VEGFbrachytherapychoroidal melanomaCollaborative Ocular Melanoma Studyintraoperative ultrasoundIodine-125low dosephotodynamic therapytranspupillary thermotherapytransvitreal biopsy

Identifiers

PMID30190869
PMCPMC6094673
OpenAlexW2315631763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.