Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30190851›Full record

ReviewMelanoma management2015

Predicting the outcome of melanoma: can we tell the future of a patient's melanoma?

Oriol Yélamos, Pedram Gerami

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Melanoma management, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Oriol YélamosDepartment of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, The Robert H Lurie Cancer Center, Northwestern University, 676 N. St Clair Street, Suite 1765, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Pedram GeramiDepartment of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, The Robert H Lurie Cancer Center, Northwestern University, 676 N. St Clair Street, Suite 1765, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cutaneous melanoma is responsible for the greatest number of skin cancer related deaths. For many years there were few therapeutic options. However, in the last years a number of new therapeutic options have emerged showing improved survival rates for advanced melanoma patients. A significant question based on these findings is whether identification and treatment of patients with biologically aggressive melanomas at an earlier clinical stage offer an opportunity for even greater improvement in overall survival. In this review, we will discuss the recent advancements in molecular strategies beyond traditional staging to identify biologically aggressive melanomas, and which are their implications in terms of predicting the prognosis of patients with melanoma.

Indexed as

comparative genomic hybridizationFISHgene-expression profilingmelanomanext-generation sequencingprognosissentinel lymph node biopsy

Identifiers

PMID30190851
PMCPMC6094684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.