ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2018
Revision shoulder arthroplasty: Patient-reported outcomes vary according to the etiology of revision.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of preoperative diagnosis on outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review.JSES international · 2025Review
- Are high cutibacterium bacterial loads at the time of revision shoulder arthroplasty associated with more severe clinical signs or symptoms or increased risk of recurrent periprosthetic joint infection?International orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Reverse shoulder arthroplasty with an inverted-bearing prosthesis as revision procedure for failed anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a long-term multicenter study.JSES international · 2024Article
- Survivorship analysis of CAD-CAM total shoulder replacement.Shoulder & elbow · 2024Article
- Comparison of clinical outcomes of revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for failed primary anatomic vs. reverse shoulder arthroplasty.JSES international · 2023Article
- Three-Dimensional Printing in Orthopedics: from the Basics to Surgical Applications.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2021Review
- Hemiarthroplasty and Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Conversion to Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2020Review
- Conservative management of chronicJSES open access · 2019Article
- Implementation of and findings from a regional shoulder replacement registry.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgieArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe study evaluates patient-reported outcomes in revision shoulder arthroplasty (RevSA) according to etiology.
methodsTwenty-three consecutive RevSA (minimum 2-year follow-up) were retrospectively reviewed. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores and range of motion were compared by the type of revision procedure and indication.
resultsEQ5D-QOL, VAS-pain, ASES, and forward elevation improved after RevSA. The infection group had least improvements. Revision to a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) demonstrated the most improvement in VAS-pain, forward elevation, and ASES.
conclusionsRevision to RTSA significantly improved PRO scores compared to hemi- or total shoulder arthroplasty. RevSA for infection demonstrated the least improvement in outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.