ArticleScientific reports2018
Regenerating a monoblock to obturate root canalsvia a mineralising strategy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To develop a novel strategy for sealing and obturating dental root canals by tooth-like tissue regeneration, premolars with mature root apices were freshly collected, and root canals were prepared by following the clinical protocols in vitro. The teeth were immersed in supersaturated calcium and phosphate solution containing gallic acid and fluoride. At certain intervals, the dental roots were taken out, and their mineral precipitates were characterised by scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive spectroscopy mapping, X-ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy. The cytocompatibility of the mineralizing products were evaluated with rabbit bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in vitro. Results showed that the precipitates were mainly composed of fluoridated hydroxyapatite with ahexagonal prism morphology. Fluoridated hydroxyapatite initially nucleated and grew from the root canal dentine surface to the root canal centre. The fluoridated hydroxyapatite precipitate and root canal dentine intergraded together such that the interface became hardly distinguishable. The fluoridated hydroxyapatite precipitate grew into and obturated the dentinal tubules. In the root canal, the regenerated fluoridated hydroxyapatite densely packed and bundled together with a c-axis extension. After 7 days of mineralisation, the root canal was completely obturated, and the apical foramen was sealed. The mineralizing products had good biocompatibility with the cells, and the cells grew well on the mineralized surface. Biomimetic mineralisation strategy provides a novel means to regenerate tooth-like tissue to seal the root canal system permanently other than by passive synthetic material filling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.