Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30190560›Full record

ArticleHeredity2018

Power law fitness landscapes and their ability to predict fitness.

Diogo Passagem-Santos, Simone Zacarias, Lilia Perfeito

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Diogo Passagem-SantosInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciencia, Oeiras, Portugal. dsantos@igc.gulbenkian.pt.ORCID 0000-0001-9114-7873
Simone ZacariasInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciencia, Oeiras, Portugal.
Lilia PerfeitoInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciencia, Oeiras, Portugal. lperfeito@igc.gulbenkian.pt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whether or not evolution by natural selection is predictable depends on the existence of general patterns shaping the way mutations interact with the genetic background. This interaction, also known as epistasis, has been observed during adaptation (macroscopic epistasis) and in individual mutations (microscopic epistasis). Interestingly, a consistent negative correlation between the fitness effect of beneficial mutations and background fitness (known as diminishing returns epistasis) has been observed across different species and conditions. We tested whether the adaptation pattern of an additional species, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, followed the same trend. We used strains that differed by the presence of large karyotype differences and observed the same pattern of fitness convergence. Using these data along with published datasets, we measured the ability of different models to describe adaptation rates. We found that a phenotype-fitness landscape shaped like a power law is able to correctly predict adaptation dynamics in a variety of species and conditions. Furthermore we show that this model can provide a link between the observed macroscopic and microscopic epistasis. It may be very useful in the development of algorithms able to predict the adaptation of microorganisms from measures of the current phenotypes. Overall, our results suggest that even though adaptation quickly slows down, populations adapting to lab conditions may be quite far from a fitness peak.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenetic FitnessEpistasis, GeneticGenes, FungalModels, GeneticMutationSchizosaccharomyces

Identifiers

PMID30190560
PMCPMC6180038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.