Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30190541›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Targeted enrichment outperforms other enrichment techniques and enables more multi-species RNA-Seq analyses.

Matthew Chung, Laura Teigen, Hong Liu, Silvia Libro, Amol Shetty, Nikhil Kumar, Xuechu Zhao, Robin E Bromley, Luke J Tallon, Lisa Sadzewicz and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Meta-Analysis ofG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Transcript-Capture sequencing enriches mRNA ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. UsingVirulence · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew ChungInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9545-523X
Laura TeigenUniversity of Wisconsin Oshkosh, Oshkosh, WI, 54901, USA.
Hong LiuDivision of Infectious Diseases, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California, 90502, USA.
Silvia LibroNew England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, 01938, USA.
Amol ShettyInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Nikhil KumarInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Xuechu ZhaoInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Robin E BromleyInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Luke J TallonInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Lisa SadzewiczInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Claire M FraserInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
David A RaskoInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7337-7154
Scott G FillerDivision of Infectious Diseases, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California, 90502, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7278-3700
Jeremy M FosterNew England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, 01938, USA.
Michelle L MichalskiUniversity of Wisconsin Oshkosh, Oshkosh, WI, 54901, USA.
Vincent M BrunoInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Julie C Dunning HotoppInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA. jdhotopp@som.umaryland.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3862-986X
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USNew England Biolabs (United States) · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Oshkosh · USThe Lundquist Institute · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Technology CoreU19AI110820 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI DUNNING HOTOPP, JULIE · 2014 to 2023
$36.5M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI110820
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enrichment methodologies enable the analysis of minor members in multi-species transcriptomic data. We compared the standard enrichment of bacterial and eukaryotic mRNA to a targeted enrichment using an Agilent SureSelect (AgSS) capture for Brugia malayi, Aspergillus fumigatus, and the Wolbachia endosymbiont of B. malayi (wBm). Without introducing significant systematic bias, the AgSS quantitatively enriched samples, resulting in more reads mapping to the target organism. The AgSS-enriched libraries consistently had a positive linear correlation with their unenriched counterparts (r

Indexed as

RNA, BacterialRNA, FungalRNA, HelminthRNA, MessengerAnimalsAspergillus fumigatusBrugia malayiSequence Analysis, RNAWolbachiaRNA, BacterialRNA, FungalRNA, HelminthRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID30190541
PMCPMC6127098
OpenAlexW2793385724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.