Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30190531›Full record

ArticleNature reviews. Cardiology2018

Hallmarks of cardiac regeneration.

Alessandro Bertero, Charles E Murry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature reviews. Cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Phoenix Heart-PICSO and the Rebirth of Embryonic Life in the Ischemic Myocardium.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Cardiac preservation usingFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Genome Editing and Cardiac Regeneration.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Can polarization of macrophage metabolism enhance cardiac regeneration?Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alessandro BerteroInstitute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Center for Cardiovascular Biology, and Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4919-9087
Charles E MurryInstitute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Center for Cardiovascular Biology, and Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. murry@uw.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3862-6773

Funding

Vascularization and Growth of Human Myocardial GraftsP01HL094374 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MINAMI, ELINA · 2010 to 2014
$14.5M
Cell-Based Cardiac RepairR01HL084642 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MURRY, CHARLES E · 2007 to 2014
$4.9M
Primate Heart RegenerationR01HL128362 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MURRY, CHARLES E · 2016 to 2019
$3.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL094374NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL084642NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL128362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Muscle DevelopmentMyocardiumNeovascularization, PhysiologicVentricular RemodelingAnimalsFibrosisHeart DiseasesHumansRecovery of FunctionRegenerative MedicineTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID30190531
PMCPMC6340768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.