Trial reportScientific reports2018
Visual percepts modify iconic memory in humans.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Effects of Adding Pictorial Depth Cues to the Poggendorff Illusion.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Masking interferes with haptic texture perception from sequential exploratory movements.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our visual system briefly retains a trace of a stimulus after it disappears. This phenomenon is known as iconic memory and its contents are thought to be temporally integrated with subsequent visual inputs to produce a single composite representation. However, there is little consensus on the temporal integration between iconic memory and subsequent visual inputs. Here, we show that iconic memory revises its contents depending upon the configuration of the newly produced single representation with particular temporal characteristics. The Poggendorff illusion, in which two collinear line segments are perceived as non-collinear by an intervening rectangle, was observed when the rectangle was presented during a period spanning from 50 ms before to 200 ms after the presentation of the line segments. The illusion was most prominent when the rectangle was presented approximately 100 to 150 ms after the line segments. Furthermore, the illusion was observed at the center of a moving object, but only when the line segments were presented before the rectangle. These results indicate that the contents of iconic memory are susceptible to the modulatory influence of subsequent visual inputs before being translated into conscious perception in a time-locked manner both in retinotopic and non-retinotopic, object-centered frames of reference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.