Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30190425›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

GEF mechanism revealed by the structure of SmgGDS-558 and farnesylated RhoA complex and its implication for a chaperone mechanism.

Hikaru Shimizu, Sachiko Toma-Fukai, Kenji Kontani, Toshiaki Katada, Toshiyuki Shimizu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Structural Dynamics of Rho GTPases.Journal of molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Splice switching an oncogenic ratio of SmgGDS isoforms as a strategy to diminish malignancy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hikaru ShimizuGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 113-0033 Tokyo, Japan.
Sachiko Toma-FukaiGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 113-0033 Tokyo, Japan.
Kenji KontaniDepartment of Biochemistry, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, Kiyose-shi, 204-8588 Tokyo, Japan.
Toshiaki KatadaFaculty of Pharmacy, Musashino University, Nishitokyo-shi, 202-0023 Tokyo, Japan.
Toshiyuki ShimizuGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 113-0033 Tokyo, Japan; shimizu@mol.f.u-tokyo.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SmgGDS has dual functions in cells and regulates small GTPases as both a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) for the Rho family and a molecular chaperone for small GTPases possessing a C-terminal polybasic region followed by four C-terminal residues called the CaaX motif, which is posttranslationally prenylated at its cysteine residue. Our recent structural work revealed that SmgGDS folds into tandem copies of armadillo-repeat motifs (ARMs) that are not present in other GEFs. However, the precise mechanism of GEF activity and recognition mechanism for the prenylated CaaX motif remain unknown because SmgGDS does not have a typical GEF catalytic domain and lacks a pocket to accommodate a prenyl group. Here, we aimed to determine the crystal structure of the SmgGDS/farnesylated RhoA complex. We found that SmgGDS induces a significant conformational change in the switch I and II regions that opens up the nucleotide-binding site, with the prenyl group fitting into the cryptic pocket in the N-terminal ARMs. Taken together, our findings could advance the understanding of the role of SmgGDS and enable drug design strategies for targeting SmgGDS and small GTPases.

Indexed as

Protein FoldingAmino Acid MotifsBinding SitesCatalytic DomainCrystallography, X-RayDrug DesignEnzyme AssaysGuanine Nucleotide Exchange FactorsHumansMolecular ChaperonesMolecular Docking SimulationMonomeric GTP-Binding ProteinsPrenylationProtein BindingrhoA GTP-Binding ProteinGuanine Nucleotide Exchange FactorsMolecular ChaperonesMonomeric GTP-Binding ProteinsRAP1GDS1 protein, humanrhoA GTP-Binding Proteincrystal structureguanine nucleotide exchange factorprenyl groupSmgGDS

Identifiers

PMID30190425
PMCPMC6156624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.