Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30189889›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical semantics2018

Using predicate and provenance information from a knowledge graph for drug efficacy screening.

Wytze J Vlietstra, Rein Vos, Anneke M Sijbers, Erik M van Mulligen, Jan A Kors

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical semantics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Knowledge-Based Biomedical Data Science.Annual review of biomedical data science · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wytze J VlietstraDepartment of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, 3015, GE, the Netherlands. w.vlietstra@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-1096-8563
Rein VosDepartment of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, 3015, GE, the Netherlands.
Anneke M SijbersCentre for Molecular and Biomolecular Informatics, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, 6525, GA, the Netherlands.
Erik M van MulligenDepartment of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, 3015, GE, the Netherlands.
Jan A KorsDepartment of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, 3015, GE, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiomedical knowledge graphs have become important tools to computationally analyse the comprehensive body of biomedical knowledge. They represent knowledge as subject-predicate-object triples, in which the predicate indicates the relationship between subject and object. A triple can also contain provenance information, which consists of references to the sources of the triple (e.g. scientific publications or database entries). Knowledge graphs have been used to classify drug-disease pairs for drug efficacy screening, but existing computational methods have often ignored predicate and provenance information. Using this information, we aimed to develop a supervised machine learning classifier and determine the added value of predicate and provenance information for drug efficacy screening. To ensure the biological plausibility of our method we performed our research on the protein level, where drugs are represented by their drug target proteins, and diseases by their disease proteins.

resultsUsing random forests with repeated 10-fold cross-validation, our method achieved an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 78.1% and 74.3% for two reference sets. We benchmarked against a state-of-the-art knowledge-graph technique that does not use predicate and provenance information, obtaining AUCs of 65.6% and 64.6%, respectively. Classifiers that only used predicate information performed superior to classifiers that only used provenance information, but using both performed best.

conclusionWe conclude that both predicate and provenance information provide added value for drug efficacy screening.

Indexed as

Biological OntologiesComputer GraphicsDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalFalse Negative ReactionsROC CurveComputational pharmacologyDrug efficacy screeningDrug repurposingKnowledge graphMachine learningPredicateProvenanceSystems pharmacology

Identifiers

PMID30189889
PMCPMC6127943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.