ArticleJournal of biomedical semantics2018
Using predicate and provenance information from a knowledge graph for drug efficacy screening.
Article in Journal of biomedical semantics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Context-Aware Multilevel Classification of Semantic Relations in Drug-Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) Networks-Predicting Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI) as a Case Study.Chemical research in toxicology · 2026Article
- Strategies for robust, accurate, and generalizable benchmarking of drug discovery platforms.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Article
- Strategies for robust, accurate, and generalizable benchmarking of drug discovery platforms.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Integrating and formatting biomedical data as pre-calculated knowledge graph embeddings in the Bioteque.Nature communications · 2022Article
- A Complex Heterogeneous Network Model of Disease Regulated by Noncoding RNAs: A Case Study of Unstable Angina Pectoris.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
- Identifying genes targeted by disease-associated non-coding SNPs with a protein knowledge graph.PloS one · 2022Article
- Identifying disease trajectories with predicate information from a knowledge graph.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2020Article
- Knowledge-Based Biomedical Data Science.Annual review of biomedical data science · 2020Article
- A Knowledge Graph of Combined Drug Therapies Using Semantic Predications From Biomedical Literature: Algorithm Development.JMIR medical informatics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBiomedical knowledge graphs have become important tools to computationally analyse the comprehensive body of biomedical knowledge. They represent knowledge as subject-predicate-object triples, in which the predicate indicates the relationship between subject and object. A triple can also contain provenance information, which consists of references to the sources of the triple (e.g. scientific publications or database entries). Knowledge graphs have been used to classify drug-disease pairs for drug efficacy screening, but existing computational methods have often ignored predicate and provenance information. Using this information, we aimed to develop a supervised machine learning classifier and determine the added value of predicate and provenance information for drug efficacy screening. To ensure the biological plausibility of our method we performed our research on the protein level, where drugs are represented by their drug target proteins, and diseases by their disease proteins.
resultsUsing random forests with repeated 10-fold cross-validation, our method achieved an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 78.1% and 74.3% for two reference sets. We benchmarked against a state-of-the-art knowledge-graph technique that does not use predicate and provenance information, obtaining AUCs of 65.6% and 64.6%, respectively. Classifiers that only used predicate information performed superior to classifiers that only used provenance information, but using both performed best.
conclusionWe conclude that both predicate and provenance information provide added value for drug efficacy screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.