Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30189832›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018

Classification based on extensions of LS-PLS using logistic regression: application to clinical and multiple genomic data.

Caroline Bazzoli, Sophie Lambert-Lacroix

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Caroline BazzoliLaboratoire Jean Kuntzman, Univ. Grenoble-Alpes, 700 avenue centrale, Saint Martin d'Hères, 38401, France. caroline.bazzoli@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5785-3827
Sophie Lambert-LacroixTIMC-IMAG, Univ. Grenoble-Alpes, 5 Avenue du Grand Sablon, La Tronche, 38700, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo address high-dimensional genomic data, most of the proposed prediction methods make use of genomic data alone without considering clinical data, which are often available and known to have predictive value. Recent studies suggest that combining clinical and genomic information may improve predictions. We consider here methods for classification purposes that simultaneously use both types of variables but apply dimensionality reduction only to the high-dimensional genomic ones.

resultsUsing partial least squares (PLS), we propose some one-step approaches based on three extensions of the least squares (LS)-PLS method for logistic regression. A comparison of their prediction performances via a simulation and on real data sets from cancer studies is conducted.

conclusionIn general, those methods using only clinical data or only genomic data perform poorly. The advantage of using LS-PLS methods for classification and their performances are shown and then used to analyze clinical and genomic data. The corresponding prediction results are encouraging and stable regardless of the data set and/or number of selected features. These extensions have been implemented in the R package lsplsGlm to enhance their use.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingGenome, HumanLeast-Squares AnalysisAlgorithmsDatasets as TopicGenomicsHumansLogistic ModelsNeoplasmsClassificationClinico-genomic modelHigh-dimensional dataLogistic regressionLS-PLS

Identifiers

PMID30189832
PMCPMC6127926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.