Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30189606›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Chemometric Comparison and Classification of Some Essential Oils Extracted from Plants Belonging to Apiaceae and Lamiaceae Families Based on Their Chemical Composition and Biological Activities.

Cristina Anamaria Semeniuc, Maria-Ioana Socaciu, Sonia Ancuţa Socaci, Vlad Mureșan, Melinda Fogarasi, Ancuţa Mihaela Rotar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Effects of Harvest Timing on Phytochemical Composition inAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Evaluation of Antifungal Phenolics fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cristina Anamaria SemeniucDepartment of Food Engineering, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, 3-5 Mănăştur St., 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania. cristina.semeniuc@usamvcluj.ro.ORCID 0000-0002-9721-4560
Maria-Ioana SocaciuDepartment of Food Science, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, 3-5 Mănăştur St., 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania. maria-ioana.socaciu@usamvcluj.ro.ORCID 0000-0002-8871-1995
Sonia Ancuţa SocaciDepartment of Food Science, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, 3-5 Mănăştur St., 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania. sonia.socaci@usamvcluj.ro.ORCID 0000-0003-0594-4628
Vlad MureșanDepartment of Food Engineering, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, 3-5 Mănăştur St., 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania. vlad.muresan@usamvcluj.ro.ORCID 0000-0003-2113-422X
Melinda FogarasiDepartment of Food Engineering, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, 3-5 Mănăştur St., 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania. melinda.nagy@usamvcluj.ro.
Ancuţa Mihaela RotarDepartment of Food Science, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, 3-5 Mănăştur St., 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania. anca.rotar@usamvcluj.ro.ORCID 0000-0002-4544-5754
University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca · RO

Funding

Ministry of Research and Innovation, CNCS - UEFISCDI PN-III-P1-1.1-PD-2016-0113Romanian Ministry of Research and Innovation, CCCDI - UEFISCDI PN-III-P2-2.1-CI-2017-0034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study is focused on the comparison and classification of parsley, lovage, basil, and thyme essential oils (EOs) based on their chemical composition, total phenolic content, antioxidant and antibacterial activities by using appropriate chemometric methods: Principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA). The results showed that parsley, lovage, and thyme EOs are rich in monoterpene hydrocarbons, but basil EO is rich in oxygenated monoterpenes and phenylpropanoids, and that both PCA and HCA separated essential oils into two main groups of which one contains two sub-groups. β-Phellandrene was the major component identified in parsley and lovage EOs, estragole was the major component in basil EO, and

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntioxidantsApiaceaeLamiaceaeMicrobial Sensitivity TestsOils, VolatilePhenolPhytochemicalsPlant ExtractsVolatile Organic CompoundsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntioxidantsOils, VolatilePhenolPhytochemicalsPlant ExtractsVolatile Organic Compoundsantibacterial activityantioxidant activitychemical compositionchemometricsessential oilstotal phenolic content

Identifiers

PMID30189606
PMCPMC6225327
OpenAlexW2890019878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.