Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30189557›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2018

Greenhouse gas emissions and water footprints of typical dietary patterns in India.

Rosemary F Green, Edward J M Joy, Francesca Harris, Sutapa Agrawal, Lukasz Aleksandrowicz, Jon Hillier, Jennie I Macdiarmid, James Milner, Sylvia H Vetter, Pete Smith and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05457439 (Sustainable-psycho-nutritional Intervention Program and Its Effects on Water and Carbon Footprint, Metabolic Biomarkers, and Gut Microbiota in Mexican Population), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05457439 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Sustainable-psycho-nutritional Intervention Program and Its Effects on Water and Carbon Footprint, Metabolic Biomarkers, and Gut Microbiota in Mexican Population: a m-Health Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of GuadalajaraRan2022 to 2023Enrolled112ConditionsGut Microbiota, Hyperglycemia, Hypercholesterolemia, HDLCArmsSustainable diet promotion through behavioral change intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Toward healthy and sustainable diets for the 21st century: Importance of sociocultural and economic considerations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The importance of food systems and the environment for nutrition.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Assessing the sustainability of post-Green Revolution cereals in India.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rosemary F GreenDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK; Leverhulme Centre for Integrative Research on Agriculture and Health (LCIRAH), 36 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PD, UK. Electronic address: rosemary.green@lshtm.ac.uk.
Edward J M JoyDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK; Leverhulme Centre for Integrative Research on Agriculture and Health (LCIRAH), 36 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PD, UK.
Francesca HarrisDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
Sutapa AgrawalPublic Health Foundation of India, Delhi NCR, Plot No. 47, Sector 44, Institutional Area, Gurgaon 122002, Haryana, India.
Lukasz AleksandrowiczDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK; Leverhulme Centre for Integrative Research on Agriculture and Health (LCIRAH), 36 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PD, UK.
Jon HillierRoyal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK.
Jennie I MacdiarmidRowett Institute of Nutrition and Health, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK.
James MilnerDepartment of Social and Environmental Health Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK.
Sylvia H VetterInstitute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB24 3UU, UK.
Pete SmithInstitute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB24 3UU, UK.
Andy HainesDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK; Department of Social and Environmental Health Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK.
Alan D DangourDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK; Leverhulme Centre for Integrative Research on Agriculture and Health (LCIRAH), 36 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PD, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 103932
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agriculture is a major contributor to India's environmental footprint, particularly through greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from livestock and fresh water used for irrigation. These impacts are likely to increase in future as agriculture attempts to keep pace with India's growing population and changing dietary preferences. Within India there is considerable dietary variation, and this study therefore aimed to quantify the GHG emissions and water usage associated with distinct dietary patterns. Five distinct diets were identified from the Indian Migration Study - a large adult population sample in India - using finite mixture modelling. These were defined as: Rice & low diversity, Rice & fruit, Wheat & pulses, Wheat, rice & oils, Rice & meat. The GHG emissions of each dietary pattern were quantified based on a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach, and water use was quantified using Water Footprint (WF) data. Mixed-effects regression models quantified differences in the environmental impacts of the dietary patterns. There was substantial variability between diets: the rice-based patterns had higher associated GHG emissions and green WFs, but the wheat-based patterns had higher blue WFs. Regression modelling showed that the Rice & meat pattern had the highest environmental impacts overall, with 0.77 (95% CI 0.64-0.89) kg CO

Indexed as

Greenhouse GasesDietGreenhouse EffectHumansIndiaWaterWater SupplyGreenhouse GasesWaterAgricultureDietary patternGreenhouse gas emissionsIndiaSustainabilityWater footprint

Identifiers

PMID30189557
PMCPMC6137647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.