ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2019
Mixed effect machine learning: A framework for predicting longitudinal change in hemoglobin A1c.
Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The use of machine learning on administrative and survey data to predict suicidal thoughts and behaviors: a systematic review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Pooled it
- Article
- Association between daily dose of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and change in glycated hemoglobin in patients with type 2 diabetes: interpretation of mixed-effects machine-learning models using electronic medical records.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence applications in refractive error management: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Type 2 Diabetes Prediction Model in China: A Five-Year Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Explaining Person-by-Item Responses using Person- and Item-Level Predictors via Random Forests and Interpretable Machine Learning in Explanatory Item Response Models.Psychometrika · 2025Article
- Modified tree-based selection in hierarchical mixed-effect models with trees: A simulation study and real-data application.MethodsX · 2025Article
- A DEEP NEURAL NETWORK TWO-PART MODEL AND FEATURE IMPORTANCE TEST FOR SEMI-CONTINUOUS DATA.The annals of applied statistics · 2025Article
- OpenClustered: an R package with a benchmark suite of clustered datasets for methodological evaluation and comparison.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Article
- Applications of AI in Predicting Drug Responses for Type 2 Diabetes.JMIR diabetes · 2025Article
- Efficient Nonparametric Estimation of Stochastic Policy Effects with Clustered Interference.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2025Article
- Mixed-effects neural network modelling to predict longitudinal trends in fasting plasma glucose.BMC medical research methodology · 2024Article
- Signals in the Cells: Multimodal and Contextualized Machine Learning Foundations for Therapeutics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Estimating dynamic treatment regimes for ordinal outcomes with household interference: Application in household smoking cessation.Statistical methods in medical research · 2024Article
- Hybrid statistical and machine learning modeling of cognitive neuroscience data.Journal of applied statistics · 2024Article
- Longitudinal trajectories of glycemic control among U.S. Adults with newly diagnosed diabetes.Diabetes research and clinical practice · 2023Article
- Harnessing the power of synthetic data in healthcare: innovation, application, and privacy.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Review
- Fixed Effects or Mixed Effects Classifiers? Evidence From Simulated and Archival Data.Educational and psychological measurement · 2023Article
- An overview of propensity score matching methods for clustered data.Statistical methods in medical research · 2023Article
- A review on longitudinal data analysis with random forest.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate and reliable prediction of clinical progression over time has the potential to improve the outcomes of chronic disease. The classical approach to analyzing longitudinal data is to use (generalized) linear mixed-effect models (GLMM). However, linear parametric models are predicated on assumptions, which are often difficult to verify. In contrast, data-driven machine learning methods can be applied to derive insight from the raw data without a priori assumptions. However, the underlying theory of most machine learning algorithms assume that the data is independent and identically distributed, making them inefficient for longitudinal supervised learning. In this study, we formulate an analytic framework, which integrates the random-effects structure of GLMM into non-linear machine learning models capable of exploiting temporal heterogeneous effects, sparse and varying-length patient characteristics inherent in longitudinal data. We applied the derived mixed-effect machine learning (MEml) framework to predict longitudinal change in glycemic control measured by hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) among well controlled adults with type 2 diabetes. Results show that MEml is competitive with traditional GLMM, but substantially outperformed standard machine learning models that do not account for random-effects. Specifically, the accuracy of MEml in predicting glycemic change at the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th clinical visits in advanced was 1.04, 1.08, 1.11, and 1.14 times that of the gradient boosted model respectively, with similar results for the other methods. To further demonstrate the general applicability of MEml, a series of experiments were performed using real publicly available and synthetic data sets for accuracy and robustness. These experiments reinforced the superiority of MEml over the other methods. Overall, results from this study highlight the importance of modeling random-effects in machine learning approaches based on longitudinal data. Our MEml method is highly resistant to correlated data, readily accounts for random-effects, and predicts change of a longitudinal clinical outcome in real-world clinical settings with high accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.