Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30189227›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience2018

Variability in the Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex and Vestibular Perception.

Sirine Nouri, Faisal Karmali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Vestibular Function Drives Gaze Stability in Locomoting Macaques.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Is It Me or the Train Moving? Humans Resolve Sensory Conflicts with a Nonlinear Feedback Mechanism in Balance Control.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Psychometrics of inertial heading perception.Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Effect of a False Inertial Cue in the Velocity-Storage Circuit on Head Posture and Inertia Perception.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. How Peripheral Vestibular Damage Affects Velocity Storage: a Causative Explanation.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sirine NouriJenks Vestibular Physiology Laboratory, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Ecole Centrale Lyon, Lyon, France. Electronic address: sirine.nouri@ecl14.ec-lyon.fr.
Faisal KarmaliJenks Vestibular Physiology Laboratory, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: Faisal_Karmali@meei.harvard.edu.
École Centrale de Lyon · FRMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · US

Funding

Measuring and Isolating Imprecision in Vestibular Perception and ActionR03DC013635 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI KARMALI, FAISAL · 2015 to 2017
$492k
NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC013635
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The vestibular system enables humans to estimate self-motion, stabilize gaze and maintain posture, but these behaviors are impacted by neural noise at all levels of processing (e.g., sensory, central, motor). Despite its essential importance, the behavioral impact of noise in human vestibular pathways is not completely understood. Here, we characterize the vestibular imprecision that results from neural noise by measuring trial-to-trial vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) variability and perceptual just-noticeable differences (JNDs) in the same human subjects as a function of stimulus intensity. We used head-centered yaw rotations about an Earth-vertical axis over a broad range of motion velocities (0-65°/s for VOR variability and 3-90°/s peak velocity for JNDs). We found that VOR variability increased from approximately 0.6°/s at a chair velocity of 1°/s to approximately 3°/s at 65°/s; it exhibited a stimulus-independent range below roughly 1°/s. Perceptual imprecision ("sigma") increased from 0.76°/s at 3°/s to 4.7°/s at 90°/s. Using stimuli that manipulated the relationship between velocity, displacement and acceleration, we found that velocity was the salient cue for VOR variability for our motion stimuli. VOR and perceptual imprecision both increased with stimulus intensity and were broadly similar over a range of stimulus velocities, consistent with a common noise source that affects motor and perceptual pathways. This contrasts with differing perceptual and motor stimulus-dependent imprecision in visual studies. Either stimulus-dependent noise or non-linear signal processing could explain our results, but we argue that afferent non-linearities alone are unlikely to be the source of the observed behavioral stimulus-dependent imprecision.

Indexed as

AdultEye MovementsFemaleHeadHead MovementsHumansPerceptionPostureReflex, Vestibulo-OcularRotationVestibule, LabyrinthYoung Adultjust-noticeable differencenoisevestibularvestibulo-ocular reflex

Identifiers

PMID30189227
PMCPMC6684204
OpenAlexW2891618047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.