Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30188936›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2018

Evaluation of the recombinant antigens B2t and 2B2t, compared with hydatid fluid, in IgG-ELISA and immunostrips for the diagnosis and follow up of CE patients.

Ana Hernández-González, Carlos Sánchez-Ovejero, Raúl Manzano-Román, María González Sánchez, José Manuel Delgado, Teresa Pardo-García, Francisco Soriano-Gálvez, Okan Akhan, Carmen M Cretu, Kamenna Vutova and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Cystic Echinococcosis in the Early 2020s: A Review.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Ana Hernández-GonzálezInstituto de Salud Carlos III, Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
Carlos Sánchez-OvejeroInstituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiología de Salamanca (IRNASA-CSIC), Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2634-4982
Raúl Manzano-RománInstituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiología de Salamanca (IRNASA-CSIC), Salamanca, Spain.
María González SánchezInstituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiología de Salamanca (IRNASA-CSIC), Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7176-3721
José Manuel DelgadoVircell SL, Parque Tecnológico de la Salud, Granada, Spain.
Teresa Pardo-GarcíaVircell SL, Parque Tecnológico de la Salud, Granada, Spain.
Francisco Soriano-GálvezVircell SL, Parque Tecnológico de la Salud, Granada, Spain.
Okan AkhanFaculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Carmen M CretuUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy, Colentina Clinical Hospital - Parasitology, Bucharest, Romania.
Kamenna VutovaSpecialised Hospital of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases "Prof. Ivan Kirov", Department of Infectious, Parasitic and Tropical Diseases, Medical University, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Francesca TamarozziCentre for Tropical Diseases, Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy.
Mara MaricontiDepartment of Clinical Surgical Diagnostic and Paediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Enrico BrunettiDepartment of Clinical Surgical Diagnostic and Paediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, and Division of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, San Matteo Hospital Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Ambra VolaSan Matteo Hospital Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Massimo FabianiInfectious Diseases Department, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Adriano CasulliWHO Collaborating Centre for the epidemiology, detection and control of cystic and alveolar echinococcosis, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Mar Siles-LucasInstituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiología de Salamanca (IRNASA-CSIC), Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1257-2562
Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiología de Salamanca · ESParque Tecnológico de la Salud · ESIstituto Superiore di Sanità · ITUniversity of Pavia · ITHacettepe University · TRInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESOspedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria · ITSpitalul Clinic Colentina · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cystic echinococcosis (CE) is one of the most widespread helminthic zoonoses and is caused by the tapeworm Echinococcus granulosus complex. CE diagnosis and monitoring primarily rely on imaging techniques, complemented by serology. This is usually approached by the detection of IgG antibodies against hydatid fluid (HF), but the use of this heterogeneous antigenic mixture results in a variable percentage of false positive and negative results, and has shown to be useless for follow-up due to the long persistence of anti-HF antibodies in cured patients. To improve test performances and standardization, a number of recombinant antigens mainly derived from HF have been described, among them the B2t and 2B2t antigens. The performance of these antigens in the diagnosis and follow up of patients with CE has been so far evaluated on a limited number of samples. Here, we evaluated the performances of tests based on B2t and 2B2t recombinant antigens compared to HF in IgG-ELISA and immunochromatography (IC) for the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with CE in a retrospective cohort study. A total of 721 serum samples were collected: 587 from 253 patients with CE diagnosed by ultrasonography (US), 42 from patients with alveolar echinococcosis and 92 from healthy donors from Salamanca (Spain). The highest overall sensitivity was obtained with HF in ELISA (85.5%), followed by IC containing HF and 2B2t-HF (83.0% and 78.2%, respectively). The lowest sensitivity was obtained with B2t and 2B2t in ELISA (51.8%). The highest specificity was obtained with IC containing 2B2t-HF (100%), and the lowest with HF-ELISA (78.0%). The lowest cross-reactivity with sera from patients with alveolar echinococcosis was detected with the recombinant antigens in ELISA (9.5% - 16.7%) and the highest with the HF-IC (64.3%). The results of B2t and 2B2t-ELISA were influenced by cyst stage, as classified by US according to the WHO-Informal Working Group on Echinococcosis (WHO-IWGE), with low sensitivity for inactive (CE4 and CE5) cysts, and by the drug treatment, with higher sensitivity in patients after drug treatment compared with patients not subjected to drug treatment. The two recombinant antigens in ELISA provided promising results for monitoring patients in follow-up, although their use is limited to patients with positive serology against them at the beginning of the follow-up. Potential biological reasons behind the low sensitivity of the recombinant antigens and possible strategies to enhance the performance of CE serology are discussed.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsAntibodies, HelminthAntigens, HelminthCross ReactionsEchinococcosisEchinococcus granulosusEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansImmunoassayImmunoglobulin GMaleMiddle AgedAntibodies, HelminthAntigens, HelminthImmunoglobulin GRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID30188936
PMCPMC6143278
OpenAlexW2891578205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.