Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30188912›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2018

Long term outcomes of cluster randomized trial to improve cardiovascular health at population level: The Cardiovascular Health Awareness Program (CHAP).

Simone Dahrouge, Janusz Kaczorowski, Lisa Dolovich, Michael Paterson, Lehana Thabane, Karen Tu, Jaime Younger, Larry Chambers

Abstract readMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Predictors of mortality in heart failure patients with reduced or mildly reduced Ejection Fraction: The CASABLANCA HF Study.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  3. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2023
    Article
  4. Preventive care recommendations to promote health equity.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Simone DahrougeDepartment of Family Medicine University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6488-8086
Janusz KaczorowskiDepartment of Family and Emergency Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Lisa DolovichDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Michael PatersonDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Lehana ThabaneDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Karen TuDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jaime YoungerDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Larry ChambersBruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

Canadian Institute of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionThe Cardiovascular Health Awareness Program (CHAP) cardiovascular risk reduction program consisted of sessions run by local volunteers in local pharmacies during which cardiovascular risk was assessed, healthy lifestyle and preventive care was promoted, and the participants were oriented to local resources to support changes in modifiable risk factors. A clustered randomized trial implemented in September 2006 across 39 communities targeting community-dwelling individuals 65 years and older showed a significant reduction in hospitalization one year after its implementation (rate ratio of 91 [95% confidence interval (CI): 86%-97%]). This study explores the impact of CHAP in the first five years.

methodsUsing health administrative data housed at the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, we established a closed cohort consisting of all individuals eligible in these communities at the study onset whom we followed over time. We assessed hospitalizations and survival using a negative binomial model for count data and Cox regression to assess time to first event, accounting for the clustered design. The primary outcome was the rate of cardiovascular-related hospitalizations defined as congestive heart failure, stroke or acute myocardial infarction.

resultsMost estimates pointed to an advantage for the intervention arm, but only all-cause mortality reached statistical significance (hazard ratio [95% CI] = 0.955 [0.914-0.999]). The hospitalization cardiovascular-related hospitalization rate ratio was (0.958, 95% CI: 0.898-1.022) in favour of the intervention communities, translating to an estimated 408 averted hospitalizations over the five-year period. There was no evidence of the effect of time from start of intervention.

conclusionsThe consistent direction of the outcomes in favour of the intervention arms suggests that CHAP likely had a meaningful impact on reducing cardiovascular-related morbidity and mortality. Given the low cost of the intervention, further development of CHAP should be pursued.

Indexed as

AwarenessHeart FailureHospitalizationMyocardial InfarctionStrokeAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID30188912
PMCPMC6126805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.