Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30188565›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2018

Short-course versus long-course therapy of the same antibiotic for community-acquired pneumonia in adolescent and adult outpatients.

Jesús López-Alcalde, Ricardo Rodriguez-Barrientos, Jesús Redondo-Sánchez, Javier Muñoz-Gutiérrez, José María Molero García, Carmen Rodríguez-Fernández, Julio Heras-Mosteiro, Jaime Marin-Cañada, Jose Casanova-Colominas, Amaya Azcoaga-Lorenzo and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Jesús López-AlcaldeFaculty of Medicine, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria (UFV) Madrid, Ctra. Pozuelo-Majadahonda km. 1,800, Madrid, Spain.
Ricardo Rodriguez-Barrientos
Jesús Redondo-Sánchez
Javier Muñoz-Gutiérrez
José María Molero García
Carmen Rodríguez-Fernández
Julio Heras-Mosteiro
Jaime Marin-Cañada
Jose Casanova-Colominas
Amaya Azcoaga-Lorenzo
Virginia Hernandez Santiago
Manuel Gómez-García
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red · ESInstituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria · ESMadrid Health Service · ESUnidades Centrales Científico-Técnicas · ESUniversidad Rey Juan Carlos · ESUniversity of St Andrews · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a lung infection that can be acquired during day-to-day activities in the community (not while receiving care in a hospital). Community-acquired pneumonia poses a significant public health burden in terms of mortality, morbidity, and costs. Shorter antibiotic courses for CAP may limit treatment costs and adverse effects, but the optimal duration of antibiotic treatment is uncertain.

objectivesTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of short-course versus longer-course treatment with the same antibiotic at the same daily dosage for CAP in non-hospitalised adolescents and adults (outpatients). We planned to investigate non-inferiority of short-course versus longer-term course treatment for efficacy outcomes, and superiority of short-course treatment for safety outcomes. SEARCH

methodsWe searched CENTRAL, which contains the Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections Group Specialised Register, MEDLINE, Embase, five other databases, and three trials registers on 28 September 2017 together with conference proceedings, reference checking, and contact with experts and pharmaceutical companies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing short- and long-courses of the same antibiotic for CAP in adolescent and adult outpatients. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We planned to use standard Cochrane methods. MAIN

resultsOur searches identified 5260 records. We did not identify any RCTs that compared short- and longer-courses of the same antibiotic for the treatment of adolescents and adult outpatients with CAP.We excluded two RCTs that compared short courses (five compared to seven days) of the same antibiotic at the same daily dose because they evaluated antibiotics (gemifloxacin and telithromycin) not commonly used in practice for the treatment of CAP. In particular, gemifloxacin is no longer approved for the treatment of mild-to-moderate CAP due to its questionable risk-benefit balance, and reported adverse effects. Moreover, the safety profile of telithromycin is also cause for concern.We found one ongoing study that we will assess for inclusion in future updates of the review. AUTHORS'

conclusionsWe found no eligible RCTs that studied a short-course of antibiotic compared to a longer-course (with the same antibiotic at the same daily dosage) for CAP in adolescent and adult outpatients. The effects of antibiotic therapy duration for CAP in adolescent and adult outpatients remains unclear.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsCommunity-Acquired InfectionsDrug Administration ScheduleFluoroquinolonesGemifloxacinHumansKetolidesNaphthyridinesOutpatientsPneumoniaAnti-Bacterial AgentsFluoroquinolonesGemifloxacinKetolidesNaphthyridinestelithromycin

Identifiers

PMID30188565
PMCPMC6513237
OpenAlexW2165783872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.